| QNAP TS-459 Pro NAS Network Storage Server |
| Reviews - Featured Reviews: Network | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Written by Olin Coles | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 23 March 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
QNAP TS-459 Pro NAS Server ReviewNetwork storage has become the convenient answer to centralized data for corporate enterprise environments. The QNAP TS-459 Pro NAS server uses the energy-efficient 1.66GHz Intel Atom D512 processor with 1GB of DDR2 system memory to enable VMware Ready iSCSI for virtualization deployments. Dual Gigabit Ethernet network interfaces allow failover safety, while four SATA drives deliver basic-disk or RAID configurations. In this article, Benchmark Reviews tests performance of the QNAP TS-459 Pro against several other network attached storage servers. Benchmark Reviews has monitored the network storage industry for several years now, and the same three features have always held the highest demand: speed, data redundancy, and simple yet feature-rich operation. QNAP has earned the title of NAS pioneer, not by being the first to have a network attached storage (NAS) device on the market, but by being the first to consistently offer fast Gigabit Ethernet speeds with failover, RAID hard drive functionality, and a diverse feature-rich user interface. If NAS technology were separated into two categories, there would be network storage for the small office/home office (SOHO) user, and NAS server appliances for the corporate Enterprise sector. Benchmark Reviews has recently tested the QNAP TS-119 NAS which is a single-disk network storage product made for home users, and we've also tested the goliath QNAP TS-809 Pro 8-Bay NAS that was designed with the storage needs of large businesses. Each of the network storage devices offers different things to different audiences, but neither of them make the ideal compromise to fit the needs of most users. The QNAP TS-459 Pro Turbo-NAS does.
The Most Affordable and Flexible Virtualization SolutionThe TS-459 Pro is certified as compatible with VMware vSphere4 (ESX 4.0 and above) virtualization platform. The NAS can be utilized as the networked shared storage of VMware virtualization environments and Windows cluster servers. Comparing with traditional SAN (Storage Area Network), the Turbo NAS is a competitive alternative with much lower setup and maintenance costs in an IP SAN. The Feature-rich and Integrated Applications for BusinessThe NAS supports file sharing across Windows, Mac, Linux, and UNIX platforms. Versatile business applications such as file server, FTP server, printer server, web server, and Windows AD support are provided. The dominant features, such as WebDAV, Share Folder Aggregation (also known as DFS), IPv6 and IPv4 dual-stack, Wake on LAN, schedule power on/ off, HDD S.M.A.R.T, comprehensive log systems, and policy-based unauthorized IP blocking are all included features of a QNAP NAS server. About QNAP Systems, Inc.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CPU | Intel Atom Processor D510 1.66GHz (Dual-Core) |
| DRAM | 1GB DDRII RAM |
| Flash Memory | 512MB DOM |
| HDD | Accepts 2.5/3.5" SATA x4 |
| HDD Tray | 4 x Hot-swappable and lockable tray |
| LAN Port | 2 x Gigabit RJ-45 Ethernet port |
| LED Indicators | Status, LAN, USB, eSATA, Power, HDD 1, HDD 2, HDD 3, HDD 4 |
| USB | 5 x USB 2.0 port (Front: 1; Back: 4) Support USB printer, pen drive, USB hub, and USB UPS etc. |
| eSATA | 2 x eSATA port (Back) |
| Buttons | System: Power button, USB One-Touch-Backup Button, Reset button |
| LCD panel | Mono-LCD display with backlight Enter button, Select button for configuration |
| Alarm Buzzer | System warning |
| Form Factor | Tower |
| Dimensions | 177 (H) x 180 (W) x 235 (D) mm 6.97 (H) x 7.09 (W) x 9.25 (D) inch |
| Weight | Net weight: 3.65 kg (8.04 lbs) Gross weight: 4.65 kg (10.24 lbs) |
| Sound Level (dB) | w/o HDD installed: 34.7 dB Stand by: 34.1 dB In operation: 36.8 dB (with 4 x 500GB HDD installed) |
| Power Consumption (W) | Sleep mode: 19W In Operation: 35W Power-off (in WOL mode): 1W (with 4 x 500GB HDD installed) |
| Temperature | 0~40°C |
| Humidity | 0~95% R.H. |
| Power Supply | Input: 100-240V AC, 50/60Hz, Output: 250W |
| Secure Design | K-lock security slot for theft prevention |
| VGA | Reserved VGA interface for maintenance |
| Fan | 1 x quiet cooling fan (9 cm, 12V DC) |
QNAP TS-459 Pro Software
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Powerful All-in-one server | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
QPKG Center Software Expansion
Explore the Unlimited Possibilities of Your NAS with QPKG
The Network Attached Storage (NAS) used to refer to a basic network storage device for simple data sharing but now with the high performance SoC and the advantage in power-saving design, it is redefined as a powerful embedded system that allows the possibilities of offering numerous fascinating applications. Over the past years, QNAP has successfully developed a series of All-in-One NAS servers for power users and business users providing a wide variety of software applications. Besides those QNAP provides, many other software packages are also developed in Linux open source community that power users are able to install them on their NAS to further enrich the functions. However, this is only limited to those advanced users or software developers who are more familiar with Linux systems. In order to let majority of general QNAP NAS users to also utilize their NAS servers with those software packages already developed by the open source community, QPKG platform and development framework is then introduced by QNAP.
Inspired from the powerful software package management system in Linux (yum, dpkg, etc.), but unlike those running in the modern PCs today, QPKG is designed and fine-tuned for running on Linux embedded systems like NAS along with many popular software packages ready for install. Besides, in order to publish your software in our official repository all the software packages will be verified by QNAP to prevent from others to embed malicious codes for system intrusion or potential risks of data damage. Therefore QNAP NAS users may enjoy these software packages developed by the community in a safe way through an installation method as easy as firmware update just like you would install/uninstall software in the Windows environment without the need to go through the complicated process.
QNAP has introduced some popular QPKG software packages as the demonstration purpose. Below are the quick introductions on each of them:
MLDonkey (eMule)
MLDonkey (eMule) is a door to the 'donkey' network, a decentralized network used to exchange big files on the Internet and present most features of the basic Windows donkey client. (e.g., eMule)
Slim Server on Turbo Station (with SqueezeCenter 7)
Squeeze Center is the server software from Slim Device that manages common digital audio formats (.mp3, .flac, .ogg, etc.) and streams them to its players. Slim Server On Turbo Station (SSOTS) developed by flipflip is an add-on to the Turbo Station's firmware which provides the environment to run Squeeze Center 7 on it.
Optware Ipkg (Itsy Package Management System)
Ipkg, or the Itsy Package Management System, is a lightweight package management system designed for embedded devices. It is used in the Unslung operating system for the Linksys NSLU2, in OpenWRT, OpenMoko, Gumstix, iPAQ and now on QNAP NAS too.
SABnzbd+
SABnzbd+ is a multi-platform binary newsgroup downloader written in Python language. The program works in the background and simplifies the downloading, verifying and extracting of files from Usenet. SABnzbd+ does not search for files, instead NZB files (similar to .torrent files, but for Usenet) are fed to SABnzbd+ from sites like newzbin.com, binsearch.info and tvnzb.com (Requires prior installation of Python)
Python
Python is a general-purpose, high-level programming language. Its design philosophy emphasizes programmer productivity and code readability.
WordPress
WordPress is a free, open-source personal publishing system that allows you to easily create a complex blog, or web log, on your site. Written in PHP and supported by a MySQL database, WordPress offers intuitive administrative tools and sophisticated design features that make it easy to develop and integrate a personal or professional blog on your site.
Joomla CMS
Joomla! is a free, open source content management system for publishing content on the world wide web and intranets. The system includes features such as page caching to improve performance, RSS feeds, printable versions of pages, news flashes, blogs, polls, website searching, and language internationalization. Benchmark Reviews is built from the Joomla! CMS.
phpMyAdmin
phpMyAdmin is an open source tool written in PHP intended to handle the administration of MySQL over the Internet. Currently it can create and drop databases, create/drop/alter tables, delete/edit/add fields, execute any SQL statement, and manage keys on fields.
xDove Email Server
XDove named after XMail & Dovecot the 2 open source offerings that are combined to provide a complete set of Email server functionalities which is one-click installable on your QNAP NAS. XDove not only provides SMTP, POP3 and IMAP services, it also comes with a variety of features like multiple virtual domains and accounts, AJAX webmail with extended functionalities including personal folders, address book, calendar and real-time chat among users under the same mail domain. Besides the mail services XDove offers scheduled backup and restore of your mailboxes from multiple domains which gives you an extra protection on the top of your RAID data redundancy.
AjaXplorer
AjaXplorer is a file explorer for remotely managing files on a web server or operation as a simple file-sharing system. Its rich layout and actions make it easily accessible to virtually any end-user. The AJAX based interface, providing streamlined and intuitive functionalities, similar to that of a standard file-system explorer on any operating system.
Software Expansion via QPKG Platform
The QPKG software package platform enables the users to maximize the usage of Turbo NAS by installing additional software packages developed from the users and community worldwide. This can be done by simple "download & install" clicking without going through any complicated process.
Closer Look: QNAP TS-459 Pro
The QNAP TS-459 Pro may share the same technology inside as the smaller QNAP network storage products (namely the TS-259 Pro), but the 6.97" tall by 7.09" wide by 9.25 deep profile certainly sets it apart. The empty TS-459 Pro NAS unit weighs roughly 8 LBS empty, and then bulks up to 14 LBS when filled with metal hard disk drives.
Most network administrators would agree that four drive bays is enough for any NAS product. In fact, because most users won't get deeper than RAID-5 for their network storage needs, it seems that three drives could even hit the target.
The QNAP TS-459 Pro Turbo NAS 4-Bay server is equipped with an Intel Atom-D510 dual-core processor, which is clocked to 1.66GHz, and 2GB of DDR2 system memory. QNAP employs a 512MB Disk-on-Module (DOM) flash drive to store firmware and applications on the TS-459 Pro.
QNAP has kept the front panel clutter to a minimum on the TS-459 Pro Turbo NAS 4-Bay server, with basic information displayed on the LCD screen and only a few buttons placed on the bezel. A single power button and USB (2.0) copy port are located along the lower left corner of the Turbo NAS, with four removable drive trays illuminating a green LED when a SATA HDD/SSD has been installed into position.
QNAP uses a steel-framed tray with black plastic latches for each of the four drive bays on the TS-459 Pro. Each tray stands vertically and slides smoothly into the NAS. If additional security is desired, the barrel lock can secure the drive in place. All of the drive trays used in the TS-459 Pro have dual mounting points for either 3.5" or 2.5" drives.
There's a single 1x5" strip of ventilation holes on the left side of the QNAP TS-459 Pro Turbo NAS. Other than the drive trays this is the only entry point for cool air to the dual-core Intel Atom processor, which then exhausts heated air out through a 90mm cooling fan positioned at the rear of the unit.
The LCD panel offers general information, and a two-button Enter/Select key allows for basic navigation. Beneath the LCD screen there are three colored LED lights, which indicate status on the TS-459 Pro, LAN/Ethernet activity, and if a USB device is connected to the Turbo NAS.
The four SATA drives can be installed in single disk, RAID 0 (Disk Striping), RAID 1 (Disk Mirroring), RAID 5, RAID 5+ Hot spare, RAID 6, and JBOD (Linear Disk Volume); all featuring iSCSI target services. Each drive can be formatted using FAT, NTFS, EXT3, or EXT4 file systems, and also offers AES 256-bit encryption. Our tests utilize EXT4-formatted disks without encryption.
QNAP uses a EDAC Power AC adapter on the TS-459 Pro. The model EA11351A-120 is rated for 12V 10A output. To measure isolated NAS power consumption, Benchmark Reviews uses the Kill-A-Watt EZ (model P4460) power meter made by P3 International. At idle standby mode the QNAP TS-459 Pro consumed 18 watts of electricity, which is on-par with the 19W specified. With four 750GB hard drives installed, formatting the TS-459 Pro NAS drives drew 39W according to the Kill-A-Watt power meter.
Twin eSATA expansion ports are available on the QNAP TS-459 Pro, which enabled the connection of additional high-speed attached storage appliances. Dual Gigabit Ethernet NICs are available, which can be configured as a redundant team or as two separate adapters. Four Hi-Speed USB 2.0 ports are positioned beside the RJ-45 network ports, and a Kensington lock hole is also available that allows administrators to tether the NAS server to any nearby surface.
QNAP v3 User Interface
QNAP has recently launched the v3 Graphical User Interface on their Turbo NAS servers. As a long-time NAS product tester, my experiences with the many GUIs used on the server products has been quite extensive. For the past three years, which is essentially the time period NAS products have gained in popularity to the point where network administrators consider them mainstream appliances, the one company that has always set the standard for software and menu navigation has been QNAP. So should it surprise me that a new version of their already-popular software interface was even better than the last?
QNAP is equally impressed, and has launched a demo site especially for the v3 GUI firmware, and as of this writing a new v3.2 beta firmware is available with expanded functionality. If you're considering a QNAP NAS product, I highly recommend that you browse over the demo site to get a better understanding of how nice the new GUI is.
The very first thing I noticed different once I updated the firmware was a new Administration logon screen. For a moment, I thought that I had logged into my media server, which has a similar iPhone-ish feel to it. The QNAP v3 User Interface borrows the nice rounded GUI design made popular by the Apple smart phone, and adds a myriad of sub-menus behind it.
Finding what you need has never been so easy! Whenever I test NAS products, the very first thing I must do (after updating the firmware) is to configure network settings and build the drive array. Usually this takes a few minutes of searching through the menu, even the older QNAP v2 GUI took some time, but the latest navigation interface is unbelievably easy to work with.
While many of the new aspects behind QNAP's v3 Graphical User Interface are cosmetic, it's nice to have the ability to customize the interface and build a color theme that best suites your mood. Normally I wouldn't pay this much mind, but when you work in the GUI so much that it becomes a regular stop on your Web Favorites list, it's nice to have a things tuned to your own needs. QNAP offers a live video demonstration of the v3 firmware GUI for those wanting more hands-on.
Network Terminology
Benchmark Reviews has decided to abandon our effort to educate readers on the difference between a Gigabyte, and a Gibibyte. This article will use the common metric terminology for data measurement, instead of the binary units we've used in past articles. Sadly, too many people are more interested in comfortable reading, even if it means being technically inaccurate. But for anyone who might still be interested in learning real technical terms relevant to the industry, I've added a small explanation below:
The basic unit data measurement is called a bit (one single binary digit). Computers use these bits, which are composed of ones and zeros, to communicate their contents. All files are stored as binary files, and translated into working files by the Operating System. This two number system is called a "binary number system". In comparison, the decimal number system has ten unique digits consisting of zero through nine. Essentially it boils down to differences between binary and metric measurements, because testing is deeply impacted without carefully separating the two. For example, the difference between the transfer time of a one-Gigabyte (1000 Megabytes) file is going to be significantly better than a true binary Gigabyte (referred to as a Gibibyte) that contains 1024 Megabytes. The larger the file used for data transfer, the bigger the difference will be.
Have you ever wondered why your 500 GB hard drive only has about 488 GB once it has been formatted? Most Operating Systems utilize the binary number system to express file data size, however the prefixes for the multiples are based on the metric system. So even though a metric "Kilo" equals 1,000, a binary "Kilo" equals 1,024. Are you confused yet? Don't be surprised, because even the most tech savvy people often mistake the two. Plainly put, the Kilobyte is expressed as 1000 bytes, but it is really comprised of 1,024 bytes.
Most network engineers (myself included) are not fully aware that the IEC changed the way we calculate and name data chunks when they published the new International Standards back in December 1998. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) removed the old metric prefixes for multiples in binary code with new prefixes for binary multiples made up of only the first two letters of the metric prefixes and adding the first two letters of the word "binary". For example, instead of Megabyte (MB) or Gigabyte (GB), the new terms would be Mebibyte (MiB) or Gibibyte (GiB). While this is the new official IEC International Standard, it has not been widely adopted yet because it is either still unknown by institutions or not commonly used.
Personally, I think the IEC took a confusing situation and simply made it more of a mess. As I mentioned earlier, the Kilobyte was previously expressed as 1000 bytes, even though it was really comprised of 1,024 bytes. Now, the Kilobyte really is expressed correctly as 1000 bytes, and the Kibibyte is the item comprised of 1,024 bytes. In essence, the IEC just created a new name for the binary item and left the existing name for the metric item. Hopefully that clears things up, and you can thank Benchmark Reviews for training the next generation of Network Engineers.
NAS Testing Methodology
Although each of the devices we tested can accommodate several different disk configurations, it was decided that basic (single) disk and RAID-5 configurations were the best way to measure data throughput for our NAS servers. Our tests utilize Windows XP so that previous results can be used for comparison, but we recognize that Widows 7 offers faster transfer speeds.
Connected directly to the Realtek RTL8168D Family PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC by a three-foot CAT6 patch cable, the NAS products received one test transfer followed by three timed transfers. Each test file was sent to the Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11 SATA-II HDD installed in the NAS for a timed write test, and that same file was sent back to an identical Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11 HDD drive (ST31500341AS) in the test system to record the read test. Each test was repeated, and the first three identical results were recorded and charted.
The two transfer tests: read and write, were conducted on each NAS appliance using the 100 MB file and then the 1 GB file. Additionally, a second set of tests were conducted with Jumbo Frame enabled. While the Synology Disk Station DS209, DS408, Cube Station CS407, and QNAP TS-409 Pro/TS-209 Pro each offered 9000K MTU Jumbo Frame settings available, the D-Link DNS-323 and QNAP TS-509 Pro do not. In the Jumbo Frame tests the Realtek RTL8168D Gigabit NIC was set to use the 9K MTU value with Jumbo Frame enabled. For the sake of benchmark results, the TS-509 Pro was also tested in the RAID-5 configuration (three disks), and included 10 GiB file transfers.
NAS Comparison Products
- D-Link DNS-323 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-209 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-409 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
- QNAP TS-419P Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
- QNAP TS-459 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
- QNAP TS-509 Pro Gigabit 5-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-809 Pro 8-Bay SATA Turbo NAS server
- Synology Disk Station DS209 2-Bay DS209 NAS server
- Synology Cube Station CS407 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
- Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
- Thecus N7700 Gigabit 7-Bay SATA NAS server
- Patriot Corza PCZ35SNAS2 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS Server
Support Equipment
- (3) Western Digial Caviar 750GB SATA-II 7200 RPM Hard Disk Drives
- 3-Foot Category-6 Solid Copper Shielded Twisted Pair Patch Cable
- Realtek RTL8168D PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Driver Version 5.724.423.2009)
- 1 metric Gigabyte Test File (1 GB / Gigabyte = 1,000,000,000 bytes)
- 10 metric Gigabyte Test File (10 GB / Gigabyte = 1,000,000,000 bytes)
Test System
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P (Intel X58/ICH10R Chipset)
- Processor: Intel Core i7-920 Nehalem 2.66 GHz (BX80601920)
- System Memory: OCZ 6GB 1600MHz CL7 DDR3 OCZ3P1600LV6GK
- Disk Drive: OCZ Vertex 120GB SATA SSD OCZSSD2-1VTX120G
- Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP-3 (optimized to 16 processes at idle)
1GB Single-Disk Test Results
With so many features available to offer a broad range of functionality, NAS server products can be daunting when you try to nail down performance. In this article, Benchmark Reviews will refer to performance as the bandwidth speed results of a file transfer test. The first tests we perform utilizes a single 1GB (1000 megabytes / 1,000,000,000 bytes) file in a transfer to and from the NAS. On products that support the feature, tests using the EXT3 and EXT4 file format will be included. Using an FTP tool so that exact transfer time could be captured, each NAS was tested for transfer bandwidth.
As you can see for yourself in the chart below, QNAP has certainly set itself apart as the dominate force in file transfer speed... even without the aid of Jumbo Frame support on their NAS products. The TS-809 Pro is built from similar hardware found in the TS-509 Pro, and even without the extra Jumbo packet size we see that QNAP products are designed for optimal transfer performance. At 62.5 MB/s read speed (using EXT4) the TS-809 Pro competes on the same level as the QNAP TS-459 Pro. With 55.6 MB/s read speeds at 1500 MTU and 66.7 MB/s at 9000 MTU, the QNAP TS-459 Pro could very well be the top contender here.
Next in line is the TS-509 Pro with 58.8 MB/s using EXT3, matching the 58.8 MB/s read bandwidth of the QNAP TS-509 Pro. The single-drive QNAP TS-119 and Synology DS408 coming in close behind with a best of 55.6 MB/s each with Jumbo Frame. The Thecus N7700 comes in right behind the top three leaders, with a best of 50.0 MB/s, matching performance with the Synology DS209. Although the QNAP TS-419P shares the same hardware as the TS-119, for some reason it didn't post the same performance numbers and dropped back to 50.0 MB/s with Jumbo Frame support.
Moving on to the 1 GB write bandwidth test, our results suggest that while it may sometimes it will be faster to read files from a NAS server then it is to write files onto it, the opposite is true more often than not. The Network Attached Storage servers each have their own strengths, with some being more robust in write-to performance when others conformed to the traditionally impressive read-from performance.
At the top of our charts the QNAP TS-809 Pro offers the highest performance with EXT4, as it did in 1GB read tests, and yields 76.9 MB/s. Formatted with EXT3, the TS-809 Pro offered 71.4 MB/s, followed by the QNAP TS-509 Pro which maintained 62.5 MB/s without the comfort of Jumbo Frame support. Next came the Thecus N7700 which produced a best of 62.5 MB/s, which finishes out the list of top-performers.
The QNAP TS-459 Pro NAS server produced 41.7 MB/s at 1500 MTU, and remained relatively unchanged with 41.8 MB/s once 9000K Jumbo Frame was enabled at each end. The Synology Disk Station DS209 narrowly beat the larger DS408, and scored a swift 43.5 MB/s write performance with Jumbo Frame enabled. A single-drive QNAP TS-119 held a steady 33.3 MB/s speed, scoring the same with and without Jumbo Frame enabled, and was tailed by the Thecus N3300 at 32.3 MB/s.
The lower-end spectrum consists of all the remaining NAS products, with the next closest competitor being the QNAP TS-419P which scored a noteworthy 25.6 MB/s. The QNAP TS-409 Pro reached only 20.3 MB/s write performance using Jumbo Frame, and 16.5 MB/s without it. The older Synology CD407 performed at roughly half the speed of its newer predecessor, and the remainder of the bunch trailed distantly behind. Let's move on to the larger file chunk testing, because next up is our 10 GB (1000 metric megabytes / 10,000,000,000 bytes) tests. Using only a single hard drive for testing in each NAS, network throughput would be put to the test.
10GB Single-Disk Test Results
Examining 10GB basic file transfer speeds, QNAP's TS-459 Pro, TS-809 Pro, and TS-509 Pro continued to impress us with the high-bandwidth read performance. At 56.2 MB/s standard and 65.4 MB/s with Jumbo Frame enabled, the QNAP TS-459 Pro delivers phenomenal performance. The QNAP TS-809 Pro and TS-509 Pro both provide 55.6 MB/s without the use of Jumbo Frame. QNAP's single-drive TS-119 offered the same performance once Jumbo Frame was enabled, but reduced to 47.6 MB/s at 1500 MTU. The Synology DS209 and DS408 maintained a close relationship with peak performance around 47 MB/s in normal mode, and improved to 49.3 and 48.3 MB/s read performance with Jumbo Frame enabled at both ends (respectively). At 50.3 MB/s with Jumbo Frame support, the QNAP TS-419P offers very good large file transfer speeds, but without JF support the speed slows to 39.8 MB/s. The Thecus N7700 was able to sustain 44.5 MB/s using Jumbo Frame, and 41.5 MB/s without it, which was very similar to the N3200 Pro.
In our 10GB write performance tests, the charts were shuffled a bit. The Thecus N7700 makes up for above-average read performance by offering excellent large-file write performance and sustained 56.2/58.8 MB/s in normal and Jumbo Frame modes, and for once QNAP was not the performance leader. Next in line came the QNAP TS-809 Pro with 54.4 MB/s using EXT3 and 48.3 MB/s with EXT4. Then came the TS-509 Pro, which has held a top position for most tests until now, and scored 47.0 MB/s. QNAP's TS-459 Pro dropped to 39.2 MB/s at 1500 MTU and 40 MB/s with Jumbo Frame enabled. The Synology DS209 and DS408 have performed in the middle of the pack for our 10GB file transfer tests, and performed at 42.9/40.0 and 36.8/36.3 MB/s in normal and Jumbo Frame modes.
The single-drive QNAP TS-119 and three-drive Thecus N3300PRO both score around 32 MB/s in our large file JBOD tests, and trail behind the leaders by almost 20 MB/s. QNAP's TS-419P illustrates a weakness in write-to performance, and produces only 25.4 MB/s at its best and trailing it's CPU/RAM clone (TS-119) by 7 MB/s. In each and every test the Patriot Corza NAS performed poorly compared to similar network storage appliances, but then again this network appliance costs less than $100.
In our next section, Benchmark Reviews tests these network storage appliances with RAID-5 disk configuration.
NAS Comparison Products
- D-Link DNS-323 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-209 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-409 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
- QNAP TS-419P Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
- QNAP TS-459 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
- QNAP TS-509 Pro Gigabit 5-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-809 Pro 8-Bay SATA Turbo NAS server
- Synology Disk Station DS209 2-Bay DS209 NAS server
- Synology Cube Station CS407 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
- Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
- Thecus N7700 Gigabit 7-Bay SATA NAS server
- Patriot Corza PCZ35SNAS2 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS Server
1GB RAID Test Results
Unless you're operating a data center or have so many files that they require the raw storage space of three (or more) individual drives, most NAS owners will likely take advantage of a RAID-5 configuration instead. In a Basic Disk configuration, each drive is partitioned similar to the drives on most desktop computers. However, when three or more drives are combined into a RAID-5 array, the size of two disks is combined while the third (or forth) disk holds bit parity information. In RAID-5 each disk rotates responsibility, so one disk holds the parity bit for each cycle while data is written to the others. This improves performance in most circumstances, but there are drawbacks under the right conditions. Using an FTP tool so that exact transfer time could be captured, each NAS was tested for transfer bandwidth:
Beginning with a single 1GB file transfer to each NAS built into a three-drive RAID-5 array, our results look very similar to those we recorded with basic disk/JBOD configuration. Setting a trend, the QNAP TS-809 Pro found itself at the top of our charts. Performing at 66.7 MB/s using EXT4, the TS-809 Pro was a good notch ahead of the next best result. Next was the QNAP TS-459 Pro, which produced 58.8 MB/s at 1500 MTU and 66.7 MB/s at 9000 MTU. Matching EXT3 performance of the TS-809 Pro was the TS-509 Pro Gigabit 5-Bay SATA NAS server, offering 62.5 MB/s read performance. Synology's Disk Station DS408 4-drive SATA RAID NAS server performed at 58.8 MB/s with Jumbo Frame and 55.6 without it. Each the Thecus NAS servers performed similarly in our RAID-5 tests. The N7700 pushed files to our workstation at 50.0 MB/s max, while the Thecus N3200 offered 47.6 MB/s in both versions of the test. Reading a single 1 Gigabyte file from either NAS showed that the performance was close, but RAID-5 proved to be the better option. The QNAP TS-419P Turbo NAS offered decent RAID-5 performance, producing a 1GB file read at 43.5 MB/s.
In the chart below, write-to testing doesn't seem to change the order of top-performers. Writing a single 1-Gigabyte file from these NAS products isn't much work for a RAID-5 array, and the results show it. With an impressive lead, the QNAP TS-809 Pro offers 76.9 MB/s performance using EXT4, and 71.4 MB/s with EXT3. Next is the QNAP TS-509 Pro, which showed a personal best of 66.7 MB/s, the Thecus N7700 offered 50.0 MB/s with Jumbo Frame enabled. In-between the top- and bottom-performing NAS products was the QNAP TS-459 Pro NAS server, which delivered 41.7 MB/s with and without Jumbo frame.
The Synology DS408 indicates reversal of benefits for RAID-5 over Basic Disk for this test. The RAID-5 disk array offered only 30.1 MB/s under normal transfers for the DS408, compared to the more impressive 38.5 MB/s for the Basic Disk configuration. At the tail end of our chart is the Thecus N3200PRO, which offered relatively poor results. With three drives behind a RAID-5 array, the N3200PRO could perform no better than 23.3 MB/s. Just as it has done in the basic disk test, the QNAP TS-419P NAS demonstrates slower write-to performance than its read speeds, and score only 21.7MB/s with Jumbo Frame support. Next stop, 10GB file transfers...
Testing with 10GB files is a lot to ask from any server, let alone a compact NAS product. There aren't too many occasions that call for file transfers of this size, but these occasions are on the rise as HD video sizes grow larger. For this test series, Benchmark Reviews has uploaded the large 10GB test file with and without Jumbo Frame to see how well the NAS performed with a three-disk RAID-5 array.
10GB RAID Test Results
In our 10GB read-from benchmark test, the results were extremely close just like we discovered in the 1GB tests. The QNAP TS-459 Pro delivered the best performance of the series, with 55.3 MB/s at 1500 MTU and 64.9 MB/s with 9000 MTU. Despite the lack of Jumbo Frame support, QNAP's TS-509 Pro offered excellent performance by pushing 58.8 MB/s through the Broadcom BCM5787 NetLink Gigabit Ethernet NIC. Trailing slightly behind was the TS-809 which offered 55.9 MB/s using EXT4. The RAID-5 array performed better for the TS-509 Pro than single disk, as was expected with the divided disk workload.
Synology wasn't so far behind though, because with Jumbo Frame enabled the DS408 sill read at an impressive 52.6 MB/s, which was even with the Thecus N7700 when you compare the average. Even the Thecus N3200PRO did extremely well, performing at 46.5 MB/s at 1500 MTU, and 52.6 MB/s with Jumbo Frame. At 41.3 MB/s the QNAP TS-419P keeps up with the others, but still falls short of the performance a larger NAS product like the TS-809 Pro can produce.
Things change noticeably in the 10GB write-to tests, which keep the QNAP TS-809 Pro ahead of the others with 66.7 MB/s using EXT3. The QNAP TS-509 Pro on still near the top, with the Thecus N7700 right behind it, and then the Synology DS408 and Thecus N3200PRO attached to the bottom. Beginning with the TS-509 Pro, the top performance is recorded at 52.6 MB/s while operating in a RAID-5 array. The Thecus N7700 offers similar performance at 51.3/52.6 MB/s, essentially matching speed. At the other end of the spectrum is the Synology DS408 which takes a huge performance hit without Jumbo Frame to record only 27.8 MB/s, and then a more modest 43.5 with 9000 MTU enabled. Configured in a RAID-5 array, the Thecus N3200PRO scored a Jumbo Frame best of 22.7 MB/s. There's a large difference in performance between a top-end NAS product like the TS-809 Pro (or even TS-509 Pro), and the QNAP TS-419P. Offering 21.2 MB/s isn't bad mind you, but if write speed is critically important to your organization, then the higher-end products will be the best fit.
From our perspective, and after testing two of the newest NAS products available, it appears that technology is still catching up to potential. NAS products equipped with full-blown desktop processors are pushing the bandwidth speeds as high as they've every been measured, while on-chip solutions (like those from Marvell) are steadily improving. Some NAS products even offer 10GBps Ethernet connections, which may not seem reasonable with the limitations of a SATA interface, but who really knows what the future holds. Please continue on to my final thoughts and conclusion.
NAS Comparison Products
- D-Link DNS-323 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-209 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-409 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
- QNAP TS-419P Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
- QNAP TS-459 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
- QNAP TS-509 Pro Gigabit 5-Bay SATA NAS server
- QNAP TS-809 Pro 8-Bay SATA Turbo NAS server
- Synology Disk Station DS209 2-Bay DS209 NAS server
- Synology Cube Station CS407 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
- Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
- Thecus N7700 Gigabit 7-Bay SATA NAS server
NAS Server Final Thoughts
It's not going to make a lot of sense for resellers and IT professionals to outfit a client with a Windows-based server if it's only going to be used for serving out files, sharing printers, and controlling Active Directory objects; one fairly inexpensive NAS does all this in its most basic form at less than half the cost. It's not until you consider that some manufacturers outfit their NAS series with full LAMP (Linux Apache MySQL and PHP) package for web servers, along with FTP and media tools, that the list of items a NAS product could potentially replace grows very large.
So what can you expect from most NAS products? More than you can with some pedestal or rack servers. This is supposed to be my final thoughts, and quite frankly I just barely touched the surface of features NAS products can offer. Most of my NAS reviews focus on performance, and sparingly supply feature lists. So let's recap some feature highlights that most modern NAS products offer:
- Hot-swappable SATA-II drive storage bays, usually with 5.25-to-2.5" adapters available.
- RAID-0, 1, 5, 6, 5 + Spare, 10, Single, and JBOD disk configurations.
- Dual Gigabit Ethernet ports for failover redundancy or network teaming.
- Windows Active Directory Services and NT4 support with login via Samba/AFP/FTP for domain users.
- Linux based O/S with Apache-based web serving, usually partnered to PHP and MySQL allowing you to run dynamic web sites directly from the NAS.
- eSATA and High-Speed USB 2.0 ports capable of connecting external hard disk drives, flash storage, and compatible printers.
Obviously the list could go on and on, especially if you noticed the multi-page layout of features and functionality. Taking into consideration that NAS products seem to all offer a feature-set that reads like a chefs shopping list, it's no wonder why these NAS products are quickly replacing Windows Server products. After all, for the price of one RAID-5 capable NAS and three 2.0 TB SATA-II HDDs you'll get four Terabytes of total storage space and still spend well below the cost of one single Windows Server Operating System and the required client access licenses.
While it's true that these NAS products will do almost everything a Windows Server platform can, they still fall very short of one important task: Windows software. Many of my clients have servers which require some form of server-side software to manage a database. Some of the most common applications that require almost no processing power but still require installation on a Windows O/S are QuickBooks and AutoCAD licensing server. Imagine the possibilities you could offer clients with a full server-in-the-box solution. I believe that this will be the next evolution in NAS products, as consumer demand more versatility out of their investment.
But there are still a few more things you can't do on a NAS, such as utilize the onboard O/S to install applications. Most NAS products utilize a Linux variant ('Nix) with little or no command interface, so even if you knew how to install from YUM or a similar repository the functionality doesn't exist. Even once that obstacle is navigated, I have a feeling that users will then demand a Windows emulator so they can install and utilize Windows-specific software on their NAS (such as license servers and anti-virus command points). It seems that these problems all revolve around side-stepping Microsoft products and licensing, which is not surprising.
QNAP TS-459 Pro Conclusion
Although the rating and final score mentioned in this conclusion are made to be as objective as possible, please be advised that every author perceives these factors differently at various points in time. While we each do our best to ensure that all aspects of the product are considered, there are often times unforeseen market conditions and manufacturer changes which occur after publication that could render our rating obsolete. Please do not base any purchase solely on our conclusion, as it represents our product rating for the sample received which may differ from retail versions.
Benchmark Reviews begins our conclusion with a short summary for each of the areas that we rate. The first is performance, which considers how effective the QNAP TS-459 Pro NAS server performs in operation against similar network storage products. Based on the test results with both single and RAID-5 disk configurations, the QNAP TS-459 Pro appears to be read-dominant and offers excellent performance when fetching small to large files. Our best read-from performance was 66.67 MB/s using 9000 MTU Jumbo Frame on a single-disk setup, and 56.18 at normal MTU. Write-to performance was decent but less impressive, and offered 41.67 MB/s with and without Jumbo Frame support. Asking the QNAP TS-459 Pro to combine three hard drives into a RAID-5 array actually improved performance, and proved the strength of Intel's Atom D510 dual-core processor. Read increased to remained high at 66.67 MB/s at 9000-MTU and 58.82 MB/s at 1500 MTU. Writes performed slightly slower, and with and without Jumbo Frame the TS-459 Pro scored a best of 41.67 MB/s.
Without an LCD display revealing the model number, network administrators would be hard pressed to tell the difference between the QNAP TS-459 Pro and the previously-released QNAP TS-419P. The Titanium-colored brushed-steel chassis is more than enough to protect against impact damage, while the textured flat-black bezel will avoid fine scratches unlike glossy plastic surfaces. The titanium finish is both attractive and fingerprint friendly, while the front bezel looks good and maintains straight-forward ergonomics. An external AC power supply 'brick' is easily replaceable if there's ever a problem, but thankfully QNAP offers a warranty for those willing to be patient with their service.
If you're familiar with storage area network devices or large pedestal storage servers, then the QNAP TS-459 Pro will be a welcomed appliance to the network. With four SATA drive bays worth of storage, there will be enough versatility for two RAID-1 sets or a single RAID-5 or -6 array. QNAP includes two network interfaces for separate networks or redundant failover connectivity, and two eSATA ports for adding additional external storage devices to the NAS. The vented drive trays help focus airflow through the chassis, and the vent holes along the left will prove helpful in keeping the entire using cool. The real credit for functionality is the GUI user interface, which turns a simple NAS into several different shades of workstation and server computer.
There's a lot of value in the QNAP TS-459 Pro Turbo NAS server for the corporate Enterprise environment, and as of late March 2010 the TS-459 Pro model was listed at NewEgg for $899. Compared to the less-impressive Marvell-based QNAP TS-419P which sells for $600, that's a hefty difference for a moderate performance gain. Considering the cost to performance ratio, along with the wealth of features the entire Turbo NAS series provides, the TS-459 Pro is a great jack-of-all-trades network storage appliance with top-level transfer speeds. For storage-centric environments that need the absolute best, QNAP offers the TS-809 Pro is still available for $1700 without drives. SOHO users might not need four or more drive bays, and home users could feel more comfortable with the single-bay QNAP TS-119 for $300. We've tested all of these QNAP network storage solutions, and user interface allows nearly unlimited possibilities.
The QNAP TS-459 Pro Turbo NAS network storage server is going to be an excellent alternative to small data clusters or a file server stuffed with drives. The additional functionality should certainly not go overlooked, because it could save your company money in other departments or cut the cost of buying additional equipment for your home business. The TS-459 Pro reviewed in this article offers four bays of SATA storage, allowing RAID configuration possibilities most other all-in-one products cannot deliver, and satisfies the storage-space intensive corporate market as well as SOHO power-users at the same time. If you're an IT professional looking to offer a network-attached mass-storage server with redundant data arrays and network failover features, the QNAP TS-459 Pro is great for storage-centric operational needs with outstanding file transfer speeds and a fair startup cost.
Pros:
+ 66.7/41.7 MBps best read/write performance
+ VMware Ready iSCSI for virtualization deployments
+ Online RAID Capacity Expansion and Level Migration
+ 4-Bay SATA hot-swap RAID storage
+ Dual Gigabit Ethernet NICs offer teaming and failover safety
+ Pre-installed PHP+MySQL and Apache web server
+ RAID-0/1/5/6/5+Spare/JBOD disk configurations
+ No wiring needed; SATA and power on backplane
+ LCD Panel configures basic information without web interface
+ Rugged brushed-steel chassis provides durability
+ Four High-Speed USB-2.0 ports + USB Copy port
+ Two eSATA ports for additional storage expansion
+ Frequent firmware development and free software support
+ One-year product warranty with free tech support
+ Outstanding new v3.xx administration GUI
Cons:
- Lacks ZFS file system support
- Integrated PSU could cause trouble if replacement is needed out of warranty
Ratings:
- Performance: 9.25
- Appearance: 9.75
- Construction: 9.75
- Functionality: 9.50
- Value: 6.75
Final Score: 9.0 out of 10.
Excellence Achievement: Benchmark Reviews Golden Tachometer Award.
Benchmark Reviews encourages you to leave comments (below), or ask questions and join the discussion in our Forum.
Related Articles:
- Cooler Master CM690-II Advanced RC-692-KKN2
- Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 X2 Video Card
- Intel DH67BL H67-Express Motherboard
- 4TB Seagate Desktop HDD ST4000DM000
- Cooler Master Elite 330 Case RC-330-KKN1-GP
- ProlimaTech MK-13 Heat-Pipe VGA Cooler
- SteelSeries Kinzu Optical Gaming Mouse
- Intel DX79SI LGA2011 Desktop Motherboard
- ASUS Radeon HD 4830 Video Card EAH4830
- Overlord: Most Evil Video Game of 2007 for PC/XBox 360


The NAS provides Web File Manager for you to easily download, upload, and manage the files on the server by web browser.
Comments
gbit + gbit = 2 gbit lan connection
Antonio
For purposes of evaluation and comparison only the packaged WHS systems like HP or Asus could be compared to the NAS systems. It would be impossiable to quantify the wide variation of surplus "Old PC" configurations and evaluate performance. It would also be interesting to look at a New Build cost for a WHS box using low-cost components.
The HP includes an iTunes server and Twonky media...it can host a website, FTP, print server, and remote access any capable machines on the network (requires XP pro, Vista Pro or Ultimate or Win 7 equilivant).
I am not really debating the merits of either typs but I wonder how it stands up to the speed of these NAS boxes.
* No NIC Teaming
* No 4 Disk RAID5 (to benchmark maximum transfer)
* No NIC teaming on the side connecting to it - like a server connecting to shared storage, at an entry level.
* No testing with multiple clients connected.
Needs more testing guys....
As to bonding making the benchmarks faster... no. 1gbit is good for ~125MB/sec minus overhead of the protocols.
My Win7 machine can copy to/from my wife's Vista machine 110MB/sec. 60-70MB/sec doesn't seem all that fast. I can copy my 3GB Win7 ISO in under 30 seconds.
Both of our machines have only a single HD, not raided, and both are low end Dells. Nothing says low end like an i7 with ATI 4850 and a 360watt PSU
We do teaming all the time on Dell PowerEdge servers and switches, and it certainly makes a difference. While Gigabit maxes out at about 90MB/sec (that's the overhead from 125MB/sec), it would be nice to get more. Especially if you had a couple of systems transferring data to/from the device. I'm not saying I expect these QNAP's to be comparable to an Equallogix PS5000 SAN, but it would be nice if we could get them half-way.
While your single PC to single PC transfer is very good, *I* am more interested in full out sustained MB/sec and/or IOPS to determine if these would be good for say shared storage between two ESX servers in a lab, to test out vMotion, HA, DRS, etc.
This is the other reason why I would have liked to see the tests with all 4 ddrives in use, to get a feel for it's max throughput.
I'd like to point out my 110MB/sec is ACTUAL transfer speeds via windows file sharing and only 4% kernel time to boot.
My plan is to get a server, use my MSDN to drop Windows server on it, plop a few SSDs with a fast RAID controller. I'm thinking I'll have to get a 10gbit card and a nice switch
I also use the Dell Power Edge and if I could access a QNAP, which is 4 or 8 slot tower to rack, 2 rather than 1 Gbit Gbit would be great because it saves lots of money.
I purchased the unit as a cheap file server to host my website at home myself. with some of these cheap cable internet deals from optusnet I think I will have a verrry cost effective hoisting system that should outperform any shared hosting package anywhere out in cyberspace. WIll update things as it progresses.
Regards Nick Pidoulas
Webmaster, owner and founder of
#showoffyourwheels.com
Yet, as you'd probably have to buy a retail Windows OS box (instead of OEM), it is still an over expensive rip-off.