| QNAP TS-509 Pro Gigabit 5-Bay SATA NAS Server |
| Reviews - Featured Reviews: Network | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Written by Olin Coles | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Friday, 07 November 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
QNAP TS-509 Pro NASWhen corporate funds are tight, companies find new ways to reduce operating costs wherever they can. As a network administrator for several small and medium businesses, I'm used to seeing pedestal servers with expensive Windows Server edition Operating Systems running for the sole purpose of serving files out to the workgroup or domain. These environments have made it necessary to look for money-saving opportunities elsewhere in the office environment. A few years back Network Attached Storage server hit the scene with a price tag comparable to the alternative, but the NAS products offered in today's market are far superior and cost much less than before. QNAP offers many affordable NAS server solutions for every department size, and their Turbo Station TS-509 Pro delivers feature-rich functionality to the enterprise environment. In this article, Benchmark Reviews tests the performance of the 5-drive hot-swappable SATA Gigabit NAS server. As a product analyst, I know that my job is to test and research products for consumers before they consider them on store shelves. Even though I also own and operate a small business which manages corporate networks, the list of products I get to work with still pales in comparison to the items our sponsors send. So when someone in my position is blown away at the myriad of features and functions embedded into this extremely affordable product, it's worth taking to heart. The unfortunate downside to offering such a myriad of features and functionality is that there's only so much that can be said about it before I lose your interest. In this review of the TS-509 Pro, only the most important features will be discussed. Powered by Intel Celeron 1.6 GHz CPU, 1GB DDRII memory, the 5-bay, hot-swappable TS-509 Pro delivers superior performance for multiple business applications and intensive concurrent data access. The Linux OS and applications of the TS-509 Pro are embedded in the flash DOM that higher stability is guaranteed. Moreover, the dual Gigabit LAN ports can be configured as Failover, Load balancing, or serving two different subnets which enables more deployment options in a business network environment.
Advanced RAID redundancy with expandability and upgradeability
Easy setup, low-cost maintenance Modern business requires a centralized data center to protect information asset, back up critical data, share the information among workgroups or departments. A solid, efficient, and flexible data backup system is the key to greater business agility and also an increasingly important task for IT administrator. QNAP TS-509 Pro Turbo NAS is the new generation all-in-one NAS server for SMB and enterprises. It offers the most reliable and powerful storage solution. With superior performance, versatile server features, best-in-class RAID data protection, and rock-solid hot swappable hard drive design, the TS-509 Pro brings business nowadays a truly new experience of instant data access and sharing, a protected mass storage, value-plus server features at the lowest maintenance cost. About the company: QNAP Systems, Inc.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Processor | Intel Celeron Processor 1.6GHz | ||||
| Memory | 1GB DDRII RAM, 128MB flash (DOM) | ||||
| HDD Capacity | 5 x 3.5" SATA I/II HDD, up to 5TB (the standard system is shipped without HDD) | ||||
| HDD Tray | 5 x hot-swappable and lockable tray | ||||
| LAN Port | 2 x Gigabit RJ-45 Ethernet port | ||||
| LED Indicators | Status, HDD 1, HDD 2, HDD 3, HDD 4, HDD 5, LAN, USB | ||||
| USB | 5 x USB 2.0 (Front: 1; Back: 4) Support USB printer, disk, pen drive, USB hub, and USB UPS etc. |
||||
| eSATA | 1 x eSATA port (Back) | ||||
| Buttons | System: Power button, USB one-touch backup button, reset button | ||||
| LCD Panel | Mono-LCD display with backlight Enter button, Select button for configuration | ||||
| Alarm Buzzer | System warning | ||||
| Form Factor | Tower | ||||
| Dimensions | 261.1(D) x 188.5(W) x 261.1(H) mm 10.28(D) x 7.42(W) x 10.28(H) inch |
||||
| Weight |
|
||||
| Operation Environment | Temperature 0~40ËšC Humidity 0~95% R.H. |
||||
| Power Supply | ATX 250W, Input: 100-264 Vac~, 46-63Hz, 5A | ||||
| Power Consumption | Sleep mode 47.3W In operation 84.7W |
||||
| Secure Design | K-Lock security slot for theft prevention | ||||
| VGA | Reserved VGA interface for maintenance | ||||
| RS-232 | RS-232 x1 | ||||
| Fan | 12cm quiet cooling fan (12V DC) | ||||
| Sound Level: | Standby: 34.2 dB In operation: 41.2dB |
I know that most times the testing methodology is skipped over by readers like a legal disclaimer. But hopefully, I can persuade you to read it through. You see, I will do something more people should do in their work: I will educate you. It's almost guaranteed.
Please continue on to the next page to learn the difference between a Megabyte, and a Mebibyte. You probably had no idea there was such a thing, but it's time to correct our slow-learning industry with the facts.
Network Terminology
You're about to be confused, or educated; or both. I'm warning you now, because it has become apparent that most consumers don't know the difference between a Gigabyte, and a Gibibyte. Essentially it boils down to binary versus metric measurement, but testing is deeply impacted without carefully separating the two. For example, the difference between the transfer time of a one-Gigabyte (1000 Megabytes) file is going to be significantly different than a true binary Gigabyte (referred to as a Gibibyte) that contains 1024 Megabytes.
In case you're not up to speed with modern network terminology, our you're just new to the technology, here is a little refresher for you. The basic unit data measurement is called a bit (one single binary digit). Computers use these bits, which are composed of ones and zeros, to communicate their contents. All files are stored as binary files, and translated into working files by the Operating System. This two number system is called a "binary number system". In comparison, the decimal number system has ten unique digits consisting of zero through nine.
Have you ever wondered why your 500 GB hard drive only has about 488 GB once it has been formatted? Most Operating Systems utilize the binary number system to express file data size, however the prefixes for the multiples are based on the metric system. So even though a metric "Kilo" equals 1,000, a binary "Kilo" equals 1,024. Are you confused yet? Don't be surprised, because even the most tech savvy people often mistake the two. Plainly put, the Kilobyte is expressed as 1000 bytes, but it is really comprised of 1,024 bytes.
Most network engineers (myself included) are not fully aware that the IEC changed the way we calculate and name data chunks when they published the new International Standards back in December 1998. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) removed the old metric prefixes for multiples in binary code with new prefixes for binary multiples made up of only the first two letters of the metric prefixes and adding the first two letters of the word "binary". For example, instead of Megabyte (MB) or Gigabyte (GB), the new terms would be Mebibyte (MiB) or Gibibyte (GiB). While this is the new official IEC International Standard, it has not been widely adopted yet because it is either still unknown by institutions or not commonly used.
Personally, I think the IEC took a confusing situation and simply made it more of a mess. As I mentioned earlier, the Kilobyte was previously expressed as 1000 bytes, even though it was really comprised of 1,024 bytes. Now, the Kilobyte really is expressed correctly as 1000 bytes, and the Kibibyte is the item comprised of 1,024 bytes. In essence, the IEC just created a new name for the binary item and left the existing name for the metric item. Hopefully that clears things up, and you can thank Benchmark Reviews for training the next generation of Network Engineers.
In this review, the QNAP TS-509 Pro Gigabit 5-Bay SATA NAS server was compared against the Synology DS408, QNAP TS-409, D-Link DNS-323, and the older Synology CS407 NAS. All five of these NAS products are Gigabit-speed Ethernet network devices, and offer Basic Disk and RAID configurations.
NAS Testing Methodology
Although each of the devices we tested can accommodate several different disk configurations, it was decided that basic (single) disk and RAID-5 configurations were the best way to measure data throughput on the Synology DS408.
Connected directly to the Realtek RTL8168 Gigabit Ethernet NIC by a three-foot CAT6 patch cable, the NAS products received one test transfer followed by three timed transfers. Each test file was sent to the Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11 SATA-II HDD installed in the NAS for a timed write test, and that same file was sent back to an identical Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11 HDD drive (ST31500341AS) in the test system to record the read test. Each test was repeated, and the first three identical results were recorded and charted.
The two transfer tests: read and write, were conducted on each NAS appliance using the 100 MiB file and then the 1 GiB file. Additionally, a second set of tests were conducted with Jumbo Frame enabled. While the Synology Disk Station DS408, Cube Station CS407, and QNAP TS-409 Pro/TS209 Pro each offered 9000K MTU Jumbo Frame settings available, the D-Link DNS-323 and QNAP TS-509 Pro do not. In the Jumbo Frame tests the Realtek RTL8168 Gigabit NIC was set to use the 4K MTU value with Jumbo Frame enabled. For the sake of benchmark results, the TS-509 Pro was also tested in the RAID-5 configuration (four disks), and included 10 GiB file transfers.
NAS Comparison Products
-
QNAP TS-509 Pro Gigabit 5-Bay SATA NAS Server
-
Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
Synology Cube Station CS407 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-409 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
-
D-Link DNS-323 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-209 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
Support Equipment
-
(4) Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11 SATA-II 7200 RPM Hard Disk Drives
-
3-Foot Category-6 Solid Copper Shielded Twisted Pair Patch Cable
-
Realtek RTL8168 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Driver Version 5.682.1122.2007)
-
100 Binary Megabytes Test File (100 MiB / Mebibyte = 104,857,600 bytes)
-
1 Binary Gigabyte Test File (1 GiB / Gibibyte = 1,073,741,824 bytes)
-
10 Binary Gigabytes Test File (10 GiB / Gibibyte = 1,073,741,824 bytes)
Test System Hardware
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 (Intel X48 Chipset) with version F6a BIOS
- Processor: Intel E8400 Core 2 Duo 3.0 GHz (Overclocked to 3.6 GHz)
- System Memory: Corsair PC3-14400 DDR3 1800MHz
- Primary Drive: Patriot Warp 128GB SATA-II SSD PE128GS25SSDR
- Secondary Drive: Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11 SATA-II Hard Disk Drive ST31500341AS
- Optical Drive: ASUS BC-1205PT SATA Blu-ray Disc Optical Drive
- Enclosure: Lian Li PC-B25B Black Aluminum Mid-Tower ATX Case
- PSU: ePower Technology EP-1200P10 xScale 1200W PSU
- Monitor: SOYO 26-Inch Widescreen LCD Monitor DYLM26E6
- Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP-3 (optimized to 16 processes at idle)
NAS Testing Results
With so many features available to offer a broad range of functionality, NAS server products can be daunting when you try to nail down performance. In this article, Benchmark Reviews will refer to performance as the bandwidth speed results of a file transfer test. For those of you who just skipped over the last page and are not so keen to the Mebibyte per second terminology, you can substitute it with Megabyte per second as they are roughly identical.
The first test we performed is a simple 100 MiB (100 binary megabytes / 104,857,600 bytes) file transfer to and from the NAS. This test used to take our NAS test products a few seconds, leaving the margin for error very small. But in the past year there have been major gains in NAS transfer performance, and now our tests end in as little as one second. Using an FTP tool so that exact transfer time could be captured, each NAS was tested for transfer bandwidth.
As you can see for yourself in the chart below, QNAP has certainly set itself apart in small file transfers. The TS-509 Pro doesn't offer Jumbo Frame, and so all of our tests use the same result twice, but even without the extra packet size we see that QNAP has designed a winner. At 66.7 MiB/s read bandwidth the QNAP TS-509 Pro is our highest 100 MiB performer, with the Synology DS408 coming in close behind with a best of 50.0 MiB/s, and QNAPs own TS-409 Pro with a best of 45.0 MiB/s with Jumbo Frame enabled.
Moving on to the 100 MiB write bandwidth test, the collective results confirmed that it is still faster to pull a file from the NAS servers then it is to push a file onto it. The Network Attached Storage servers we tested did not degrade bandwidth performance by much, when compared to their respective read test results. QNAP maintained the 66.7 MiB/s it recorded in the read tests, just as the Synology Disk Station DS408 kept it's 50 MiB/s performance with Jumbo Frame enabled (but reduced to 33.3 MiB/s at standard 1500 MTU). The lower-end spectrum consists of all the remaining NAS products, with the next closest competitor being the QNAP TS-409 Pro which reached only 27.5 MiB/s write performance using Jumbo Frame, and 16.5 MiB/s without it. The older Synology CD407 performed at roughly half the speed of its newer predecessor, and the remainder of the bunch trailed distantly behind. Again, the Disk Station DS408 prevailed, giving a substantial performance boost over the nearest competition. Let's move on to the larger file chunk testing...
Next up was the 1 GiB (1024 binary megabytes / 1,073,741,824 bytes) read test, which was offered results very similar to the 100 MiB read tests. Using only a single hard drive for testing in each NAS, network throughput would be put to the test.
Fresh out of the gates, QNAP's TS-509 continued to impress us with the high-bandwidth read performance of 60.2 MiB/s. The Synology DS408 pulled ahead of the lower-end pack with 48.8 MiB/s in normal mode, and improved to 56.9 MiB/s read performance with Jumbo Frame enabled at both ends. The QNAP TS-409 Pro was slightly behind it with a best of 43.3 MiB/s, followed in step by the Synology CS407 and QNAP TS-209 Pro. The D-Link DNS-323 was the slowest performer, offering its best at 18.6 MiB/s.
Finishing off our Basic Disk bandwidth readings was the 1 GiB write performance test. Unlike the previous three benchmark tests which proved that all six products would perform at about the same ratio regardless of file size, the 1 GiB file chunk write-to test indicates a different story. Only two products really have write-to performance worth mentioning, as the others are so far behind the curve that they make up a low-end portion of the chart. QNAP kept ahold of its continued lead, performing at 64.0 MiB/s without Jumbo Frame available. Next was the Synology DS408 with a respectable yet distant best of 39.4 write performance utilizing Jumbo Frame
The QNAP's TS-409 Pro scored 20.3 MiB/s, while Synology's CS407 managed a best of 20.9 MiB/s with Jumbo Frame but only 11.6 MiB/s without it. QNAPs little TS-209 Pro NAS settled in at a best of 19.5 MiB/s, which isn't far ahead of the D-Link DNS-323 NAS with 15.6 MiB/s using Jumbo Frame.
Taking the entire test section as a whole, one thing becomes abundantly clear: QNAP has raised the bar for NAS performance with their Turbo Station TS-509 Pro. So with the competition out of the way, our next section will focus on the benefits of RAID-5 over Basic Disk configurations in terms of bandwidth throughput performance.
NAS Comparison Products
-
QNAP TS-509 Pro Gigabit 5-Bay SATA NAS Server
-
Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
Synology Cube Station CS407 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-409 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
-
D-Link DNS-323 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-209 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
RAID-5 Test Results
Unless you are someone with so many files that they require the raw storage space of four individual drives, most NAS owners will likely take advantage of the available RAID configurations. In a Basic Disk configuration, each drive is partitioned similar to the drives on most desktop computers. However, when three or more drives are combined into a RAID-5 array, the size of two disks is combined while the third (or forth) disk holds bit parity information. In RAID-5 each disk rotates responsibility, so one disk holds the parity bit for each cycle while data is written to the others. This improves performance in most circumstances, but there are drawbacks under the right conditions.
Testing the QNAP TS-509 Pro Gigabit 5-Bay SATA NAS server directly against last months featured Synology Disk Station DS408 4-drive SATA RAID NAS server, we compare performance in both single-disk Basic mode and four drive RAID-5 mode. The read and write performance was measured for a series of 1 Gibibyte and 10 Gibibyte file transfers. Here's how it breaks down:
At its best, the QNAP TS-509 Pro produced 64.0 MiB/s in RAID-5 but without the aid of Jumbo Frame packets. For Synology, the RAID-5 disk array offered 56.9 MiB/s under normal transfers for the DS408 NAS. With a single hard drive comprising our Basic Disk configuration, the QNAP TS-509 Pro performed at 60.2 MiB/s in 1 Gibibyte read tests, while the Synology DS408 produced a respectable 56.9 MiB/s using Jumbo Frame. Reading a single 1 Gibibyte file from either NAS showed that the performance was close, but RAID-5 proved to be the better option.
In the chart below, we see that things have changed for the write-to testing. Writing a single 1 Gibibyte file from these NAS products is a lot more work, and the results sometimes show it. While the QNAP TS-509 Pro showed a personal best of 68.3 MiB/s, the DS408 indicates reversal of benefits for RAID-5 over Basic Disk for this test. The RAID-5 disk array offered only 30.1 MiB/s under normal transfers for the DS408, compared to the more impressive 39.3 MiB/S for the Basic Disk configuration. The real single-disk winner was the QNAP TS-509 Pro with a solid 64.0 MiB/s write-to performance without using Jumbo Frame. Next stop, 10 GiB file transfers...
Testing a 10 GiB file is a lot to ask from any server, let alone a NAS product. There aren't too many occasions that call for file transfers of this size, but these occasions are on the rise. For this test series, Benchmark Reviews has uploaded the large 10 MiB test file with and without Jumbo Frame to see how well the NAS performed with a single disk versus a four-disk RAID-5 array.
In our read benchmarks, the results were extremely close just like we discovered in the 1 GiB tests. Despite the lack of Jumbo Frame, QNAP's TS-509 Pro offers tremendous performance from the Broadcom BCM5787 NetLink Gigabit Ethernet NICs. The RAID-5 array performed best for the TS-509 Pro, resulting in 60.2 MiB/s read bandwidth. The TS-509 Pro also beat-out the competition with a single disk configuration, yielding a 56.9 MiB/s read bandwidth performance. Synology wasn't so far behind though, because with Jumbo Frame enabled the DS408 sill read at an impressive 53.6 MiB/s. The Basic Disk setup was close behind with 48.8 MiB/s with Jumbo Frame, but actually scored better at 49.5 MiB/s with Jumbo Frame disabled.
Things change noticeably in the 10 GiB write-to tests, which we chart below. Beginning with the TS-509 Pro, the top performance is recorded at 54.2 MiB/s while operating in a RAID-5 array. The QNAP TS-509 Pro again demonstrated its superiority by producing a 48.1 MiB/s basic disk performance, which was a slight way off from Synologies best of 44.1 on the DS408 with Jumbo Frame enabled.
Without Jumbo Frame, however, the DS408 had A strange thing happen in which the upload speed to the DS40 fell flat. My results were so unexplainable that I repeated my tests five times to be sure, and so after testing for the initial three benchmarks I tore down the disk configurations and rebuilt the RAID-5 array. This was all for not, as the results remained the same and I am still a little confused by them. When Jumbo Frame was disable the DS408 scored a mere 28.7 MiB/s.
From our perspective, and after testing two of the newest NAS products available, it appears that technology is still catching up to its own potential. Please continue on to my final thoughts on the Turbo Station series, as I address the history of QNAPs product line and how it has evolved.
NAS Comparison Products
-
QNAP TS-509 Pro Gigabit 5-Bay SATA NAS Server
-
Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
Synology Cube Station CS407 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-409 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
-
D-Link DNS-323 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-209 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
Turbo Station Final Thoughts
It's not going to make a lot of sense for resellers and IT professionals to outfit a client with a Windows-based server if it's only going to be used for serving out files, sharing printers, and controlling Active Directory objects; one fairly inexpensive NAS does all this in its most basic form. It's not until you consider that QNAPs Turbo Station series offers a full LAMP package for web servers, along with FTP and media tools, the list of items this NAS product could potentially replace is very large.
So where do I begin? This is supposed to be my final thoughts, and quite frankly I just barely touched the surface of features the TS-509 Pro offers. So let's recap the highlights that will most likely capture interest:
-
Five hot-swappable SATA-II hard disk drive storage bays, with RAID-0, 1, 5, 6, 5 + Spare, Single, and JBOD disk configurations.
-
Dual Gigabit Ethernet ports for failover redundancy or teaming.
-
Windows Active Directory Services and NT4 support with login via Samba/AFP/FTP for domain users.
-
Web Station runs Apache web server, and the pre-installed PHP+MySQL allows you to run your own dynamic web site from the TS-509 Pro.
-
Five High-Speed USB 2.0 ports capable of connecting external hard disk drives, flash storage, or up to three compatible printers.
Obviously the list could go on and on, especially if you noticed two pages worth of features and functionality. Taking into consideration that the Turbo Station feature-set reads like a chefs shopping list, it's no wonder why these NAS products are quickly replacing Windows Server products. After all, for the price of the TS-509 Pro and five 1.5 TB SATA-II hard disk drives you get 7.5 Terabytes of total storage space and still come well below the cost of one single Windows Server Operating System and the required client access licenses.
I've been testing QNAP products since the original Turbo Station TS-201 dual-drive NAS, and judging the TS-509 Pro I can see that their products have evolved beyond my expectations. The Turbo Station series has been a branded name from QNAP for almost three years now, but since there has been almost twenty product releases under this series I think it might soon be time for a new name. The Turbo Station we've seen in the TS-509 Pro is light years ahead of what I tested back in the days of the TS-201, but there's still more room for improvement.
While it's true that these NAS products will do almost everything a Windows Server platform can, they still fall very short of one important task: Windows software. Many of my clients have servers which require some form of server-side software to manage a database. Some of the most common applications I see that require almost no processing power but still require installation are applications such as QuickBooks or AutoCAD licensing server. Imagine the possibilities you could offer clients with a full server-in-the-box solution. I believe that this could be the next generation of NAS products worth waiting for.
QNAP TS-509 Pro Conclusion
Benchmark Reviews believes that manufacturers should be educating consumers with their product packaging, so they can make the most informed decision possible. This is why we ratie the retail package presentation. in terms of the TS-509 Pro NAS this rating is somewhat high because QNAP has done an excellent job of informing buyers with plenty of on-the-box specifications and feature information. It doesn't hurt that they've got plenty of room, as the retail package is very large in comparison to most products. The concept of truth in advertising is getting further and further away every year, but for once I can see that not every company is out to cover their product with catch phrases and slogans.
There is a very small niche of products that offer five bays of storage, and even fewer with an attractive finish. The ventilation grill along the left side of the front bezel goes completely unnoticed and provide discreet funtion with emphasis on fashion. The silver power and backup bottons pair themselves to the round lock faces on each drive tray, and help add accent to the overall look. Colorful LED lights keep things in motion without to much going on so to keep the corporate image intact without too much pizzazz.
QNAP took their time with the TS-509 Pro, and the end result is a very strong product destined to command any environment it's placed into. The Titanium-colored steel chassis is more than enough to protect against impact damage, but the piano-black bezel is high gloss and could lose its mirror finish as fine scratches develope. The integrated power supply could be trouble if it ever required replacement, but thankfully QNAP offers a warranty for those willing to be patient with their service.
Since Gigabit Ethernet has found its way into the mainstream, bandwidth throughput has gradually grown for all products involved. The Turbo Station TS-509 Pro is no different, and it handily outperformed the closest competition we compared it against in our benchmark tests. With tremendous read-from bandwidth peaking around 64.0 MiB/s for a 1 Gibibyte file, and actually improving to 68.3 MiB/s in write-to performance, the Turbo Station proved itself to be a real top-performer. The list of functionality and features is nearly endless, and could almost be considered too much for one device since it might overwhelm the average home network enthusiast or even a trained IT professional. But as the saying goes: "It's better to have and not need then to need and not have". All that's missing is the ability to install software to emulate a Windows environment.
Corporate Enterprise environments have never seen so much value in a high-performance NAS. As of July 2009 the TS-509 Pro is listed at NewEgg for $899.99 without drives, which is certain to please everyone from the accountant to the IT/IS manager since almost everything built for the business market has a high price-tag. In all regards, the Turbo Station is far more valuable than the going street price; but I admit there aren't too many consumers who will actually use it for everything it offers.
The QNAP Turbo Station Dual-Gigabit 5-bay hot-swappable SATA-II NAS server is going to be an excellent alternative to the basic workgroup and domain level file servers that most resellers use for small- to medium-sized business networks. The additional functionality should not go overlooked, because it could save your company money in other departments of cut the cost of experimenting on a sandbox server. Five bays of storage allow possibilities most other all-in-one products cannot offer, and satisfy the storage-space intensive Enterprise market. I give a strong recommendation to the QNAP TS-509 Pro for storage-centric operational needs, as there isn't very much else available to offer Enterprise level redundancy for the same price range.
Pros:
+ Extremely powerful NAS product
+ 64.0/68.3 MiB/s Gigabit Ethernet read/write performance
+ RAID-0, 1, 5, 6, 5+Spare, Single, and JBOD disk configurations
+ Dual Gigabit Ethernet NICs with teaming and failover safety
+ High-quality durable metal enclosure
+ Elegant appearance without functional compromise
+ No wiring need; SATA and power on backplane
+ Five total High-Speed USB 2.0 ports
+ Simple HTML administration interface
+ Frequent firmware development and free software support
+ Pre-installed PHP+MySQL and Apache web server
+ Multi-Terabyte storage capacity
+ Excellent cooling and ventilation
+ LED Panel can control basic functions without web interface
+ Offers eSATA connectivity for 1.5 GBps external storage
Cons:
- Does not offer Jumbo Frame functionality
- Basic web interface compared to competing options
- QNAP does not offer a local US support telephone line
- Integrated PSU could cause trouble if replacement is needed out of warranty
- Package includes obsolete CAT-5e Ethernet patch cable
Ratings:
-
Presentation: 9.25
-
Appearance: 9.50
-
Construction: 9.50
-
Functionality: 9.75
-
Value: 7.50
Final Score: 9.1 out of 10.
Excellence Achievement: Benchmark Reviews Golden Tachometer Award.
Questions? Comments? Benchmark Reviews really wants your feedback. We invite you to leave your remarks in our Discussion Forum.
Related Articles:
- OCZ Summit MLC SSD OCZSSD2-1SUM120G
- MemoRight GT MR25.2-064S 2.5-Inch 64GB SATA SSD
- EonNAS 850X NAS Network Storage Server
- OCZ Octane SATA 6 Gb/s Indilinx Everest SSD
- OCZ Technology: From SSDs to Layoffs
- Mtron Pro 7000 2.5-Inch 16GB SSD SATA7025
- Intel X25-M SATA 80GB MLC SSD
- Synology Disk Station DS-207+ SATA Gigabit NAS
- Patriot Convoy 425XL SAS/SATA RAID Enclosure
- Patriot Warp v2 SATA SSD PE128GS25SSDR


Comments
I was wondering if anyone knows if this is compatable with the
Barracuda ® XT Desktop Hard Drives
Model ST32000641AS SATA 6Gb/s 2 TB
Thanks
Marcel