Synology DS408 4-Drive SATA RAID Gigabit NAS |
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Network | ||||
Written by Olin Coles | ||||
Tuesday, 07 October 2008 | ||||
Synology DS408 NASAs a network administrator for several small and medium businesses, I am used to seeing pedestal servers with expensive Windows Server edition Operating Systems running for the sole purpose of serving files out to the workgroup or domain. Such environments has made it necessary to look for money-saving opportunities in the office environment. A few years back Network Attached Storage server hit the scene with a price tag comparable to the alternative, but the NAS products offered in today's market are far superior and cost far less than before. Synology has pioneered the NAS server into mainstream, and now offers devices to fit every range and environment from home to enterprise. Benchmark Reviews has the good fortune to performance test the 4-drive SATA Disk Station DS408 RAID NAS. Every IT professional knows that time is money in the SMB and Corporate Enterprise sector, and any product that can cost less and deliver more while saving precious time is sure to be a popular commodity. The Synology Disk Station DS408 4-Bay SATA NAS is a Gigabit network appliance which offers more features and functionality than most Windows domain controllers... for less than the price of the Server 2003 R2 or Windows 2008 Server Operating System alone!
The Synology Disk Station DS408 NAS is designed with Windows ADS authentication, USB printer sharing, dynamic website hosting, and data backup in mind. With multi-terabyte competency and high-performance file sharing, the DS408 gives business users the freedom to store massive data quickly and efficiently. While Basic Disk, JBOD, and RAID-0 are supported, the additional RAID- 1/5/6 protection further prevents data loss from inevitable disaster.
Storing and Sharing Files via Internet
PC Data and Server Data Backup
Transferring Data via FTP
Managing Files through Web Browsers
Sharing Photos and Videos with Photo Station 2 + video
Enjoying Entertainment Data Stored on Server
Enjoying Music instantly with USB Speakers
Programming your Own Web Site
USB Printer Server About the company: Synology, Inc.Synology Inc., founded in April of 2000, creates next generation Network Attached Storage servers for the international market. Providing a secure way of storing and sharing digital content, Synology products are stylish in appearance, compact in size and energy efficient. Customer's investment is enhanced with free software upgrades and 24/7 online support. This makes the Synology product an ideal choice for the Home, Small Business and Corporate setting.
|
Hardware
Power Consumption (1)
Certification
Networking Protocols
Windows ADS Domain Integration
Security
File System
File Sharing
|
Utilities
Applications
UPnP Multimedia Service Support
iTunes Server Support
Audio Station Support
Photo Station 3 Support
Management
|
RAID Management
Backup Solutions
3rd-Party Backup Support
Supported Clients
Printer Support(3)
Languages
Environment
Package Content
(1) Measured with 4 Seagate 750GB ST3750640NS hard drives. The figures could vary on different environments. |
I know that most times the testing methodology is skipped over by readers like a legal disclaimer. But hopefully, I can persuade you to read it through. You see, I will do something more people should do in their work: I will educate you. It's almost guaranteed.
Please continue on to the next page to learn the difference between a Megabyte, and a Mebibyte. You probably had no idea there was such a thing, but it's time to correct our slow-learning industry with the facts.
Network Terminology
You're about to be confused, or educated; or both. I'm warning you now, because it has become apparent that most consumers don't know the difference between a Gigabyte, and a Gigbibyte. Essentially it boils down to binary versus metric measurment, but testing is deeply impacted without carefully separating the two. For example, the difference between the transfer time of a one-Gigabyte (1000 Megabytes) file is going to be significantly different than a true binary Gigabyte (referred to as a Gigbibyte) that contains 1024 Megabytes.
In case you're not up to speed with modern network terminology, our you're just new to the technology, here is a little refresher for you. The basic unit data measurement is called a bit (one single binary digit). Computers use these bits, which are composed of ones and zeros, to communicate their contents. All files are stored as binary files, and translated into working files by the Operating System. This two number system is called a "binary number system". In comparison, the decimal number system has ten unique digits consisting of zero through nine.
Have you ever wondered why your 500 GB hard drive only has about 488 GB once it has been formatted? Most Operating Systems utilize the binary number system to express file data size, however the prefixes for the multiples are based on the metric system. So even though a metric "Kilo" equals 1,000, a binary "Kilo" equals 1,024. Are you confused yet? Don't be surprised, because even the most tech savvy people often mistake the two. Plainly put, the Kilobyte is expressed as 1000 bytes, but it is really comprised of 1,024 bytes.
Most network engineers (myself included) are not fully aware that the IEC changed the way we calculate and name data chunks when they published the new International Standards back in December 1998. The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) removed the old metric prefixes for multiples in binary code with new prefixes for binary multiples made up of only the first two letters of the metric prefixes and adding the first two letters of the word "binary". For example, instead of Megabyte (MB) or Gigabyte (GB), the new terms would be Mebibyte (MiB) or Gibibyte (GiB). While this is the new official IEC International Standard, it has not been widely adopted yet because it is either still unknown by institutions or not commonly used.
Personally, I think the IEC took a confusing situation and simply made it more of a mess. As I mentioned earlier, the Kilobyte was previouslyexpressed as 1000 bytes, even though it was really comprised of 1,024 bytes. Now, the Kilobyte really is expressed correctly as 1000 bytes, and the Kibibyte is the item comprised of 1,024 bytes. In essence, the IEC just created a new name for the binary item and left the existing name for the metric item. Hopefully that clears things up, and you can thank Benchmark Reviews for training the next generation of Network Engineers.
In this review, the Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server was compared against the QNAP TS-409, D-Link DNS-323, and the older Synology CS407 NAS. All three of these NAS products are Gigabit-speed Ethernet network devices, and offer Basic Disk and RAID configurations.
NAS Testing Methodology
Although each of the devices we tested can accommodate several different disk configurations, it was decided that basic (single) disk and RAID-5 configurations were the best way to measure data throughput on the Synology DS408.
Connected directly to the Realtek RTL8168 Gigabit Ethernet NIC by a three-foot CAT6 patch cable, the NAS products received one test transfer followed by three timed transfers. Each test file was sent to the Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11 SATA-II HDD installed in the NAS for a timed write test, and that same file was sent back to an identical Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11 HDD drive (ST31500341AS) in the test system to record the read test. Each test was repeated, and the first three identical results were recorded and charted.
The two transfer tests: read and write, were conducted on each NAS appliance using the 100 MiB file and then the 1 GiB file. Additionally, a second set of tests were conducted with Jumbo Frame enabled. While the Synology Disk Station DS408, Cube Station CS407, and QNAP TS-409 Pro/TS209 Pro each offered 9000K MTU Jumbo Frame settings available, the D-Link DNS-323 did not. In the Jumbo Frame tests the Realtek RTL8168 Gigabit NIC was set to use the 4K MTU value with Jumbo Frame enabled. For the sake of benchmark results, the Synology DS408 was also tested in the RAID-5 configuration (four disks), and included 10 GiB file transfers.
NAS Comparison Products
-
Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
Synology Cube Station CS407 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-409 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
-
D-Link DNS-323 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-209 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
Support Equipment
-
(4) Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11 SATA-II 7200 RPM Hard Disk Drives
-
3-Foot Category-6 Solid Copper Shielded Twisted Pair Patch Cable
-
Realtek RTL8168 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (Driver Version 5.682.1122.2007)
-
100 Binary Megabytes Test File (100 MiB / Mebibyte = 104,857,600 bytes)
-
1 Binary Gigabyte Test File (1 GiB / Gibibyte = 1,073,741,824 bytes)
-
10 Binary Gigabytes Test File (10 GiB / Gibibyte = 1,073,741,824 bytes)
Test System Hardware
- Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 (Intel X48 Chipset) with version F6 BIOS
- Processor: Intel E8400 Core 2 Duo 3.0 GHz (Overclocked to 3.6 GHz)
- System Memory: Corsair PC3-14400 DDR3 1800MHz
- Primary Drive: Mtron Pro 7500 32GB SATA-II SSD MSP-SATA7525
- Secondary Drive: Seagate 1.5 TB 7200.11 SATA-II Hard Disk Drive ST31500341AS
- Optical Drive: ASUS BC-1205PT SATA Blu-ray Disc Optical Drive
- Enclosure: Lian Li PC-B25B Black Aluminum Mid-Tower ATX Case
- PSU: ePower Technology EP-1200P10 xScale 1200W PSU
- Monitor: SOYO 26-Inch Widescreen LCD Monitor DYLM26E6
- Operating System: Windows XP Professional SP-3 (optimized to 16 processes at idle)
NAS Testing Results
When I first began testing our collection of NAS server products, I wasn't sure how well the Synology Disk Station DS408 NAS server would compare to the already-impressive Synology Cube Station CS407. I knew the D-Link DNS-323 NAS Server wouldn't be posing any real threat since it's rather old technology, but the newest QNAP products looked impressive when we tested them a few months back. In the charts below, we compare our five test products in a Basic Disk configuration (single HDD).
Starting with the 100 MiB (100 binary megabytes / 104,857,600 bytes) read test the Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit NAS proved to be a real contender. Boasting a phenomenal 2-second transfer time at 50.0 MiB/s, I was stunned at how quickly the test ended. With Jumbo Frame enabled, the read performance was identical to the older CS407 it replaces, and closely matched to the QNAP TS-409 Pro. However, in normal 1500 MTU mode with Jumbo Frame disabled, only the DS408 could perform at 50 MiB/s. While the D-Link DNS-323 does not offer Jumbo Frame configuration on the NAS itself, there was also no improvement to be had by adding Jumbo Frame settings to the system-side NIC for its tests. The Synology DS408 was the clear winner in the 100 MiB read bandwidth test.
Moving on to the 100 MiB write bandwidth test, the collective results confirmed that it is still faster to pull a file from the NAS servers then it is to push a file onto it. The Network Attached Storage servers we tested did not degrade bandwidth performance by much, when compared to their respective read test results. The Synology Disk Station DS408 kept it's 50 MiB/s performance with Jumbo Frame enabled, but reduced to 33.3 MiB/s at standard 1500 MTU. The next closest competitor was the QNAP TS-409 Pro, which reached 27.5 MiB/s write performance using Jumbo Frame, and 16.5 MiB/s without it. The older Synology CD407 performed at roughly half the speed of its newer predecessor, and the remainder of the bunch trailed distantly behind. Again, the Disk Station DS408 prevailed, giving a substantial performance boost over the nearest competition. Let's move on to the larger file chunk testing...
Next up was the 1 GiB (1024 binary megabytes / 1,073,741,824 bytes) read test, which was offered results very similar to the 100 MiB read tests. Using only a single hard drive for testing in each NAS, network throughput would be put to the test.
Right away the Synology DS408 pulled ahead of the pack with 48.8 MiB/s in normal mode, and improved to 56.9 MiB/s read performance with Jumbo Frame enabled at both ends. The QNAP TS-409 Pro was close behind, followed in step by the Synology CS407 and QNAP TS-209 Pro; however all three were still trailing behind by 57% or more. The D-Link DNS-323 was the slowest performer, offering its best at 18.6 MiB/s.
Finishing off our Basic Disk bandwidth readings was the 1 GiB write test. Unlike the previous three benchmark tests which proved that all five products would perform at about the same ratio irregardless of file size, the 1 GiB file chunk write-to test indicates a different story. The Synology DS408 clearly dominates the field with 49.4 MiB/s write performance utilizing Jumbo Frame, while the next nearest competitor is Synology's own CS407 at 20.9 MiB/s. QNAP's TS-409 Pro manages to settle a very close third place position, with 20.3 MiB/s Jumbo Frame performance.
Taking the entire test section as a whole, one thing becomes abundantly clear: Synology has raised the bar for NAS performance with their Disk Station DS408. So with the competition out of the way, our next section will focus on the benefits of RAID-5 over Basic Disk configurations in terms of bandwidth throughput performance.
NAS Comparison Products
-
Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
Synology Cube Station CS407 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-409 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
-
D-Link DNS-323 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-209 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
RAID-5 Test Results
Unless someone has so many files that they require the raw storage space of four individual drives, most DS408 owners will likely take advantage of the available RAID-5 (or RAID-6) configuration. In a Basic Disk configuration, each drive is partitioned similar to the drives on most desktop computers. However, when three or more drives are combined into a RAID-5 array, the size of two disks is combined while the third (or forth) disk holds bit parity information. In RAID-5 each disk rotates responsibility, so one disk holds the parity bit for each cycle while data is written to the others. This improves performance in most circumstances, but there are drawbacks under the right conditions.
Testing the Synology Disk Station DS408 4-drive SATA RAID NAS server in both single-disk Basic mode, and four drive RAID-5 mode, the read and write performance was measured for a 1 Gibibyte and 10 Gibibyte file transfer. Here's how it breaks down:
The RAID-5 disk array offered 56.9 MiB/s under normal transfers, compared to 48.8 for the Basic Disk configuration. Using Jumbo Frame, the DS408 produced 60.3 MiB/s in RAID-5, and a respectable 56.9 MiB/s in Basic Disk mode. Reading a single 1 Gibibyte file from the DS408 showed that the performance was close, but RAID-5 proved to be the better option. In the chart below, we see that things have changed for the write-to testing.
Writing a single 1 Gibibyte file from the DS408 indicates reversal of benefits for RAID-5 over Basic Disk. The RAID-5 disk array offered 30.1 MiB/s under normal transfers, compared to the impressive 39.3 MiB/S for the Basic Disk configuration. Using Jumbo Frame, the DS408 produced 31.0 MiB/s in RAID-5, but was easily beaten by 39.4 MiB/s in Basic Disk mode. For writing a 1 GiB file, Basic (single) Disk claims the performance advantage by 27%. Next we'll move a 10 MiB file for comparison.
Testing a 10 GiB file is a lot to ask from any server, let alone a NAS. There aren't too many occasions that call for file transfers of this size, but these occasions are on the rise. For this series, Benchmark Reviews has uploaded this large test file in both 1500 MTU standard and 9000 MTU Jumbo Frame to see how well the NAS performed with a single disk versus a four-disk RAID-5 array.
In our read benchmarks, the results were extremely close just like we discovered in the 1 GiB tests. The RAID-5 array performed best in Jumbo Frame mode, reading at 53.6 MiB/s. The Basic Disk setup was close behind with 48.8 MiB/s with Jumbo Frame, but actually scored better at 49.5 MiB/s with Jumbo Frame disabled. Things change in the write-to tests, which we chart below.
A strange thing happened while testing upload speed to the DS408, and my results were so unexplainable that I repeated my tests five times to be sure. So after testing for the initial three benchmarks, I tore down the disk configurations and rebuilt the RAID-5 array. However, the results remained the same, and I am still a little confused by them.
Charted in the image above you'll notice that the RAID-5 write-to bandwidth is extremely good using Jumbo Frame, scoring 44.1 MiB/s for the best of the series while Basic Disk Jumbo Frame was good for only 36.8 MiB/s. However it was when Jumbo Frame was disable that things began to take on another shape. The DS408 scored 36.3 MiB/s with a single disk receiving our upload, but with a RAID-5 array catching the data we noticed bandwidth sink to only 28.7 MiB/s.
The best I can think of is a bottleneck in the RAID-5 array when it receives an extremely large file such as the ten Gibibyte chunk we tested with. Gigabit Ethernet proved itself good for over 60 MiB/s, so the network connection is ruled out; especially since the single disk configuration had no problems. For now, I suspect this will be considered an item to be corrected by a future firmware updates. But thankfully for anyone using the Disk Station series, Synology release these free updates very often.
NAS Comparison Products
-
Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
Synology Cube Station CS407 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-409 Pro Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS Server
-
D-Link DNS-323 Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
-
QNAP TS-209 Pro Gigabit 2-Bay SATA NAS server
Disk Station Final Thoughts
It's not going to make a lot of sense for resellers and IT professionals to outfit a client with a Windows-based server if it's only going to be used for serving out files, sharing printers, and controlling Active Directory; one inexpensive NAS does all this in its most basic form. When you consider that the Synology Disk Station series offers a full LAMP package for web servers, along with FTP and media tools, the list of items this NAS product can potentially replace is very large.
So where do I begin? This is supposed to be my final thoughts, and quite frankly I just barely touched the surface of features this DS408 offers. So let's recap the highlights that will most likely capture interest:
-
Four SATA-II hard disk drive storage, with Basic (single) disk and RAID 0/1/5/6 capability. Both the DS408 and slightly larger DS508 offer RAID-6 functionality with firmware DSM2.0-0722 or later for protection against two drives failing.
-
Windows Active Directory Services and NT4 support with login via Samba/AFP/FTP for domain users.
-
Web Station runs Apache web server, and the pre-installed PHP+MySQL allows you to run your own dynamic web site from the DS408.
-
Two High-Speed USB 2.0 ports capable of connecting external hard disk drives or flash storage, as well as compatible printers.
The HTML User Interface offers a tremendous wealth of features and functionality, and as of firmware DSM2.0-0722 it gives hardcore Linux admins the ability to add NFS support using the NFD Priviledges button.
Obviously the list could go on and on, especially if you noticed two pages worth of features and functionality. Taking into consideration that the Disk Station feature set reads like a chefs shopping list, it's no wonder these NAS products are quickly replacing Windows Server products. After all, for the price of the DS408 and four 500 GB SATA-II hard disk drives you are still well beneath the cost of a single Windows Server Operating System and additional client access licenses (remember that the CS407 comes with 50)!
While the bulk of the features given to the DS408 and DS508 NAS products are inherent to Corporate Enterprise and SMB environment, the Disk Station series is not "all work and no play". Because the Disk Station is capable of delivering an equal amount of entertainment value, it becomes the best to both worlds. As much as I like the idea of plugging in USB speakers and using the DS408 as an iTunes server or as a Torrent download station, it really seems to fit best in the Corporate Enterprise sector which is more likely to utilize the four drive bays on this Gigabit NAS.
Synology DS408 Conclusion
Benchmark Reviews believes that manufacturers should be educating consumers with their product packaging, which is why we rating the retail presentation. For the Synology DS408 this rating is somewhat high, as Synology has done an excellent job of informing buyers with plenty of on-the-box specifications and feature information so they'll (hopefully) make an informed purchase. The concept of truth in advertising is getting further and further away every year, but for once I can see that not every company is out to cover their product with catch phrases and slogans. Synology dresses the DS408 in an appropriate retail package which matches the sophistication help inside.
While the Disk Station DS408 looks nearly identical to the Cube Station CS407, the breadbox-like shape and overall appearance remains appealing and surprisingly modern. The ventilation grill at the top and bottom of the front bezel help to add dimension as the green LED lights keep things in motion. Keeping the home users happy with a design that doesn't look boring isn't easy, just as it is difficult to keep the corporate image intact without too much pizzazz.
Synology has built one solid little NAS out of the DS408. The plastic front bezel is thick enough to sustain direct impact without suffering damage, while the rest of the unit is constructed of steel. Not that a network appliance will see a lot of careless handling or harsh environments, but the DS408 appears to be built prepared for the worst.
Since Gigabit Ethernet has found its way into the mainstream, bandwidth throughput has gradually grown for all products involved. The Synology DS408 is no different, and it handily outperformed the competition in our benchmark tests. With tremendous read-to bandwidth peaking around 57 MiB/s for a 1 Gibibyte file, and dropping no lower than 39 MiB/s in write-to performance, the Cube Station proved itself to be a real top- performer. The list of functionality features is nearly endless, and could almost be considered too much for one device since it might overwhelm the average home network enthusiast or even a trained IT professional. But as the saying goes: "It's better to have and not need then to need and not have".
While most home users might not be interested in paying over $800 for something they will use to store music and video, the Corporate Enterprise segment has never seen so much value. In a market where everything seems to cost more than a should, the DS408 could please everyone from the accountant to the IT/IS manager. In all regards, the Disk Station is far more valuable than the going street price; but I admit there aren't too many consumers who will actually use it for everything it offers.
The Synology Disk Station DS408 Gigabit 4-Bay SATA NAS server is going to be an excellent alternative to the basic workgroup and domain level file servers most resellers use for small business networks, and the additional functionality should not go overlooked. Home users might be better suited to the single drive DS107+ or twin-drive DS207+, but it's clear that there's certainly a welcome home for the DS408 (or even the five bay hot-swapping dual-NIC Disk Station DS508) in the storage-space intensive Enterprise market. Whether you find yourself positioning the DS408 in a home, SOHO, or Enterprise environment, just remember: this little workhorse could be your next web server as much as your next file server.
Pros:
+ Most versatile NAS on the market!
+ 60/44 MiB/s Gigabit Ethernet read/write performance
+ Offers Single, JBOD, RAID 0/1/5 disk arrays
+ Convenient compact footprint and size
+ High-quality metal enclosure
+ Elegant yet simple black appearance
+ Windows ADS compatible
+ Two High-Speed USB 2.0 ports
+ Simple HTML administration interface
+ Frequent firmware development and free software support
+ Pre-installed PHP+MySQL and Apache web server
+ Multi-Terabyte storage capacity
+ Sufficient cooling and ventilation
+ Supports IP camera monitoring
Cons:
- Does not offer eSATA connectivity
- Large AC power adapter brick adds to overall footprint
- Product dimensions are just short of 4U rack mount constraints
- Rear panel could support a 120mm cooling fan
- Package includes obsolete CAT-5e Ethernet patch cable
Ratings:
-
Presentation: 9.25
-
Appearance: 9.00
-
Construction: 9.50
-
Functionality: 10.0
-
Value: 7.25
Final Score: 9.0 out of 10.
Excellence Achievement: Benchmark Reviews Golden Tachometer Award.
Questions? Comments? Benchmark Reviews really wants your feedback. We invite you to leave your remarks in our Discussion Forum.
Related Articles:
- QNAP TS-459 Pro NAS Network Storage Server
- QNAP TS-119 Gigabit NAS Server
- ASUSTOR AS-604T NAS Network Storage Server
- QNAP TS-809 Pro 8-Bay SATA NAS
- QNAP TS-209 Pro Gigabit SATA NAS
- QNAP TS-879U-RP 10GbE NAS Server
- QNAP TS-219P+ NAS Network Server
- Thecus N7700 SATA 7-Disk RAID NAS
- IOCELL NetDISK 351UNE Network Storage Device
- Synology Cube Station CS407 4-Bay SATA Gigabit NAS