Archive Home arrow Guides arrow Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking Guide
Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking Guide
Articles - Featured Guides
Written by Servando Silva   
Wednesday, 20 April 2011

Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking Guide

Editor's Note: Before starting, you should know that any kind of overclocking normally invalidates your product's warranty. While many products come pre-overclocked, brands usually don't expect you to get extra performance for free. In this case, 2 components will be overclocked: CPU and motherboard. If you're a beginner, read the whole guide before starting, or (better) print it to have it around while your PC is being tested. Benchmark Reviews won't be responsible for any damaged component caused by overclocking.

I know, the first paragraph makes it look like a very dangerous action, but don't be scared, it isn't. In fact, I can tell you that every CPU tested in this article is completely alive and running 100% stable at the moment of publishing this article, even I tested with "dangerous" voltage levels. If you're a beginner or you haven't overclocked any LGA1155 (or similar) platform before, you need to understand the basic concepts of the commonly-used variables and the process of overclocking: raise frequency, test stability, confirm and raise frequency again until you can't complete this sequence anymore.

In our Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking Analysis, we're not covering performance change obtained by raising your CPU/RAM speed. That has been covered a lot in every CPU Review we've done in the past. It's your duty to read them and find out if overclocking is worth it to you depending on your daily applications/uses by reading our past articles. But if you want a quick review, all I can say is that there's a sweet point where overclocking won't take lots of extra potency (watts) to increase MHz. If you're looking for a basic (but decent) frequency, you should overclock without applying extra voltage and find your sweet point. We're doing some extra analysis regarding CPU voltage, temperatures and power consumption, but again, performance difference won't be shown in this article.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_Turbo_Boost.png

Before starting I need to say we would have written this guide a couple of months ago when Sandy Bridge was launched along with the H67 and P67 platforms. However, Sandy Bridge platforms suffered a 2-3 months delay thanks to a small error in the P67 chipset design. Users with B2 revision motherboards might find troubles with S-ATA 2 ports in long term use. While this was supposed to happen after 2-3 years and only to about 5% of the products shipped, Intel quickly took action on this and aborted all shipments asking manufacturers not to provide their motherboards to the distributors and resellers. Intel acted quickly enough to stop Sandy Bridge distribution besides some re-sellers, reviewers, media sites and a small portion of people who ran of to the store and bought their Sandy Bridge platform. Within the end of March and beginning of April, many brands announced they would start shipping Sandy Bridge Motherboards again, and here we are now.

The Rules have changed

Intel launched a pair of "special" processors for the LGA 1156 platform; the Core i5 655K and the Core i7 875K. Those processors were supposed to bring better overclocks without any limits. However, many of us already expected this to be part of a new methodology, in which Intel would end shipping those processors and limit all non-K processors to their stock frequencies. This happened with Sandy Bridge. The thing is that you can't overclock any non-K processor way beyond its default frequency anymore. Non-unlocked processors are stuck to Base Clock (BCLK) overclocking, which happens to be so poor with this new platform that it won't give you more than 100-200 extra MHz before reaching the limit.

Intel also got platforms separated as the P67 platforms represents a mid-high segment and the H67 platform represents a segment where the user wants to take advantage of the integrated graphics unit in their CPU. H67 platforms can't overclock with non-unlocked processors, but even worst, they won't let you OC your unlocked processor either. So again you're stuck to BCLK (if any) overclocking, but in exchange, they'll let you overclock your iGPU to some decent levels.

While there are speculations about the Z68 platform, we're still stuck at the middle of the arena mainly between the H67 and P67 platforms. Let me put it straight: if you want to overclock, you need a K processor with the P67 platform. Any other combination will result in very poor overclocking capabilities. Finally, let me add that while X58 and P55 platforms overclocked to a 200+ BCLK easily, Sandy Bridge won't give you more than 3-7 extra MHz. YES. That means the limit on Sandy Bridge motherboards lies between 103-107MHz, which is just nuts.

Why Should I Overclock?

Actually, the question is: why should YOU overclock? There are many reasons to enter the great world of overclocking. At first, it was a necessity. People had slow PCs doing heavy processes where any extra MHz would reduce time in a linear way. If a 100MHz processor was clocked to 120 MHz (20MHz sounds ridiculous, doesn't it?), an enterprise could do the process in 8.5 hours instead of 10, thus increasing efficiency. Nowadays, it's very different. Computers have become part of our daily-basis life, and 90% of the people don't use it for heavy processing anymore. Many things can be done with a PC, as it has been turned into the new primary communications tool; CPUs are much faster and normally more than enough for daily tasks. For these kinds of people running several light-loaded applications while reading Benchmark Reviews and hearing some music, a basic overclock should be more than enough. Others might complain that they do hard-processing with their PCs, and some extra MHz will help with the video-encoding, 3d rendering, math processing or any other hard task. For those who fall in this category, a medium-sized overclock should be a great addition to work with, and we're covering that today.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_Corei5_2500K.png

The Intel Core i5 2500K comes with 4 cores/4 threads running at 3.3GHz.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_Corei7_2600K.png

The Core i7 2600K works at 3.4GHz and it's got 8 threads. It has also got an extra 2MB in L3 cache.

Meet the Contenders

As I've said before, you want the Intel P67 Express platform to do some real overclocking. Also, you need a fully unlocked CPU, which at the time reduces our options to a pair of K processors: the Core i5 2500K and the Core i7 2600K. The Core i5 2500K is the small brother which appeals more thanks to its price. While it's got a 3.3GHz frequency and 6MB L3 cache and no Hyper Threading, it costs $100 USD less than the big brother. The Core i7 2600K has got a 3.4GHz frequency with 8 threads and a bumped L3 cache of 8MB. Aside from that, both processors are the same. They both have 95 watts TDP and work with dual-channel memory up to 1333MHz (or higher depending on the motherboard). Both raise their frequency with Turbo Boost up to 4x multipliers, and their performance is similar except for those tasks where more threads is better.

Brand Name & Processor Number

Base Clock Speed (GHz)

Unlocked
Turbo Frequency (GHz)
Cores/Threads Cache Memory Support TDP
Pricing (1Ku)
Intel Core i5 2500K 3.3 Core, DDR3, Power
Up to 3.7 4/4 6MB 2 channels DDR3-1333 95W $216
Intel Core i7 2600K
3.4 Core, DDR3, Power
Up to 3.8 4/8 8MB 2 channels DDR3-1333
95W $317

Overclocking Applications & Utilities

Times when overclocking was done via BIOS or hardware modifications without having specific applications to test and control parameters have come to an end. In fact, we have plenty of different applications where we can monitor all our components and utilities to test how stable our machine is after the changes. In our Overclocking Guide for Beginners , we already published a list of utilities and tools for overclocking. Two years later, things haven't changed a lot. In fact, we still use the same tools posted in that guide, which is good news for "new" overclockers or people who might want to re-try it after some years being out of action. I've chose some tools supporting the latest P67 platform because that's what we're testing today. Don't worry if you feel too overwhelmed with information, the whole list will be written in the CPU Testing Methodology section.

Our first tool is a "must" between the utilities used today. CPU-Z, developed by CPUID, is a very simple, yet complete application to check our components. There are some labels I'd like to explain here as they will be key to monitor your advances. So, open CPUz.exe and the next window will appear in your monitor:

CPU tab will show you basic information of the installed CPU, and if you want to overclock it, here is where you'll be 90% of the time. Please notice you can check CPU model and Core voltage in real time. Below, you can check the Core Speed, CPU multiplier, Bus Speed (BCLK or DMI for LGA1156 motherboards) and QPI frequency. Those will be the most useful values after all, and they all contain necessary information to achieve the best overclock.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_Corei7_2600K.png

Let's jump to the third tab. This will show you the Motherboard's manufacturer and model. More important, it will show the chipset and the BIOS version. Check your BIOS version and your manufacturer's page in order to confirm you have the latest version available as it might include enhancements and features along with a wider support for CPUs/RAM.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_Mobo.png

The next tab is called "Memory", and it will be important as you can monitor RAM frequencies and timings. Check that your RAM is working in Dual Channel mode (unless you've got 1 DIMM only) and your OS is recognizing all of it. P67 motherboards don't have a Northbridge, thus, NB frequency is grayed out. Finally, check your timings to match with those in the specifications (for beginners) and don't forget DRAM frequency actually represents Dual Data Rate MHz, so, if you're reading 800MHz it's actually 1600MHz. DRAM frequency will increase along with BCLK, so you'll need to monitor this frequency to keep it stable or in case it isn't, it will mean you'll need to decrease the memory divider/multiplier. Sandy Bridge unlocked CPUs allow you to overclock your CPU without increasing a single MHz in your RAM frequency, leaving it out of the equation. This is good and bad at the same time, because it means you won't have head-aches while overclocking your PC because you don't know your RAM, and because it won't limit our final OC. However, this also means your RAM won't be overclocked and the memory Bandwidth won't increase as it did in other platforms. If you're an avid overclocker you'll overclock your RAM after getting to know your CPU to get some extra MHz as usual.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_RAM.png

Since I'm using an ASUS motherboard I'll use ASUS AI Suite II as my support application. AI Suite is one of the best applications I've ever seen for enthusiasts. In this case, Turbo V EVO along with all the sensors will be very useful to check frequencies, temperatures, voltages and other configurations. Turbo V EVO also changes frequency and voltage values in real time without restarting or applying profiles that need to be loaded at windows start, so that's a nice plus. If you have another motherboard from a different brand, I recommend checking their official page in order to get their overclocking software.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_TurboV-EVO.png

Many brands have developed their own overclocking tools and many of them work great while having friendly user interfaces. If you want to achieve the best compatibility with your motherboard, you should check the official manufacturer's page and look for their tools. Brands like Gigabyte, ASUSTeK, MSI, ASRock and Biostar have been working hard to offer you monitoring tools were you can overclock and check temperatures in a graphic/visual interface. Some other brands like Gigabyte and ASUSTeK have gone wild, enabling some pretty interesting features like "hardware overclocking", on-board buttons, LCD posters and wireless monitoring utilities.

Processor Stability Testing

Before starting, I must say stability is a concept that can be perceived in different ways depending on your needs. While some people think SuperPi runs are enough to check stability, others want their PC to successfully run 30 hours of OCCT's Linpack test. I'm gathering all these concepts into a PC stable enough to do daily applications no matter how hard they are because that's what we're aiming for. I would be unsatisfied if my PC suffered a BSOD while doing multi-tasking, playing my favorite game online or coding and rendering the next-day's project. What you must understand, is that every component needs to be tested in different situations to check if it's 99.9% stable. In this case, since we're overclocking our CPUs (mainly), my favorite tool is Prime95. Run it through a Blend Test to check both CPU and Memory stability, or run in place large FTT for maximum heat and power consumption. Usually, a couple of hours means your PC isn't prone to suffer BSODs, but I prefer to leave it running at least 10 hours before working. Usually, a night running Prime95 should be enough.

Since we're talking about 4 core CPUs here, I usually fire up Prime95 and start doing Blend tests. Prime95 allows you to check which CPU core is failing, and so you can add voltage or compensate the CPU knowing which core is the weakest of all. However, if you're just starting to overclock your CPU, you might want to test it with something lighter, and Cinebench R11.5 is a good choice to ensure CPU is (at least) stable enough to boot into OS and open your OC tools. Even Cinebench uses all your available cores; it won't define any kind of stability by itself.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_Prime95.PNG

Next step would be testing your RAM. RAM is a little bit more difficult to test because while you can spend 10 hours running stability tests, it could fail while opening a very simple application (e.g.: Photoshop, MSN messenger, etc.). What I do is: start with MemTest and put all unused RAM to test until it reaches 100% (at least). Many people think this is enough, but RAM can be a real pain if you don't stress it enough. Try opening Prime95 again and start Blend Test (uses lots of RAM). After a couple of hours running Prime95, you might want to check with your daily applications and GPU benchmarks like Unigine's Heaven 2.1. Trust me; RAM fails exactly when you don't expect it to fail, so it's better to make sure it will be stable enough for hard daily work.

One thing people hate is watching high temperatures on their PCs. If you're using Intel's stock cooler I would recommend that you not raise CPU vCore. You might want to give a read to our latest cooling articles to change you cooler to something a little bit more appropriate. My favorite temperature monitoring tool for Intel Core processors is Real Temp. This little application has a sensor test to check if any of your cores has a stuck sensor. I've also found this is very accurate software which is a MUST in this case. Below you can see an example of our Core i7 2600K at idle mode while Noctua's NH-D14 is sitting at the top of it. Ambient temperatures were below 25ºC, and our heatsink was good enough to keep it 1-3 degrees above ambient. The latest edition of this particular software offers CPU load and Power consumption readings. With these features we can isolate CPU power from all other components.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_Real_Temp.png

You might be wondering what the appropriate range of maximum temperatures is. Have a look at the image above. If you add "temperature" plus "Distance to TJMax" values, you'll find a TJunction value. For example: in this case 28+70=98. That's the maximum temperature your CPU will support before turning the computer off for self-protection. Of course, it's very unlikely to reach these temps, and motherboards normally have protection limits somewhere between 80-90 degrees. That's why it's actually very difficult to burn a CPU nowadays unless you're giving it too much voltage.

If you're overclocking a Sandy Bridge processor, you might want to keep your temps below 70-80 degrees at full load (Prime95 FTT test). Daily applications shouldn't stress it enough to pass 70-75 Celsius. Keep in mind CPU temperatures are meant to be kept below those limits at overclocking conditions. Thanks to the 32nm manufacture, you might be able to keep your CPU below 60 or even 50 degrees at factory settings (no OC, no extra voltage). Now that you've downloaded and understood your weapons, let's get a little bit more technical and analyze all the variables you should pay attention to while overclocking. In the next page I'll explain each variable and how to control it from your BIOS/OC utility.

Understanding OC Variables

There are some basic variables you should really check while overclocking. Based on these variables, you'll be able to achieve 90% of your overclocking process and actually reach a stable and very decent frequency without messing a lot with weird numbers and values. Please refer to your motherboard's manufacturer to locate the BIOS reset switch/jumper before starting to overclock. This jumper will be very helpful if you reach a completely unstable state where the PC won't BOOT anymore. Don't panic, just turn off your computer and press/short the appropriate pins to reset your settings. Some other manufacturers implement an auto-recovery feature which (in case the PC doesn't BOOT) will recover your settings after trying to POST a couple of times without achieving it.

Now you should really have a look at your BIOS/UEFI and identify the section where all the next parameters are found. If there's a possibility to save different profiles (many motherboards feature multiple OC profiles) save a copy of your default's profile.

CPU Frequency: This frequency is calculated by multiplying CPU multiplier x BCLK. Until Intel LGA775 sockets, this frequency was calculated by multiplying CPU multiplier x Front Side Bus. Intel Core iX processors changed this FSB for a Base Clock (BCLK) which is the basis to all the parameters I'll explain below. CPU frequency is 100% related to overall speed, and thus, it's the most important factor when overclocking your setup.

BCLK: This value is the key to obtain all other values, since all of them are BCLK multiples. I won't really go deep into this value as its overclocking capabilities are way below they used to be. 100MHz is the default value but you can usually get 3-5 extra MHz or even a little bit more if you happen to have a good CPU+Motherboard.

CPU Multiplier: As its name says, this multiplier gives you the final CPU frequency value. For Sandy Bridge processors, this multiplier is higher than LGA775 CPUs. This means BCLK doesn't need to be as high as FSB to reach outstanding frequencies. With Sandy Bridge unlocked processors, this is the key to get a superb overclock. While the theoretical limit is 57x, many processors stop at 53-54x. I wouldn't be mad at that as that means I could get more than 5GHz, which is a frequency normally impossible to stabilize.

RAM Memory Multiplier: This multiplier is directly affected by BCLK and results into a final memory speed. Since we're not overclocking the BCLK that much with Sandy Bridge platforms, memory won't affect that much.

CPU EIST & Speedstep: Properly used, this technology allows CPU frequency transition between low and high states. By changing CPU voltage and lowering CPU frequency, the CPU is able to consume less power at idle mode, while increasing values whenever any process is detected. Those features can be very useful if you want to overclock your PC while keeping low temperatures and power consumption at idle mode. Unluckily, many manufacturers disable these features when you start overclocking, letting CPU voltage/frequency at their max state all the time.

Turbo Boost: This feature is inherent to Core i5/Core i7 processors only. By monitoring which cores are processing information, Turbo Boost allows them to increase CPU multipliers individually for each core, increasing final speed by 1 to 4 multiples while the rest of the cores (unused) remain at stock speeds. It's best to disable this feature when overclocking since that will make it easier to find your CPU's sweet spot. However, you can set a lower CPU frequency and let Turbo Boost reach your maximum tested overclock if you prefer.

Load-line Calibration: Also named as vDroop compensation or LLC, this feature increases CPU voltage to balance it between different states. At full load, CPU vCore droops to keep levels at Intel's specifications. While enabling LLC will give you the ability to run more MHz with "lower" voltage, this feature falls against Intel specifications, and it's not recommended, especially when you're aiming to increase vCore a lot. With Sandy Bridge introduction, LLC has become a very important value to enable in order to achieve high overclocks. Many people found that LLC enabled their CPU to reach way higher CPU multipliers, so, most of the motherboards in the market now support LLC.

PCI-E Frequency: Normally set at 100MHz, this value could help a little while overclocking your system and GPU. Try keeping it below 115MHz as it could produce S-ATA drives corruption. I normally set this value to 101MHz as a rule.

Voltage Values

If you're willing to sacrifice temperatures and power consumption to reach higher speeds, you must mess with voltages. You need to be very careful with these values since you'll be adding extra heat and electron-migration to the components. Personally, I find it better to reach maximum CPU frequency with stock voltage and let it stay there. That's because at that point, you'll be gaining speed while keeping your CPU cool enough. This will also increase power consumption by no more than 5-10 watts. Adding voltage can reach a point where CPU speed won't be comparable to the heat and power consumed, ending with lower efficiency results.

CPU vCore: This value is related to CPU frequency. If you want to get extra MHz, you'll need to add vCore to your CPU. CPU vCore is also 100% related to CPU temperature and final power consumption. With Sandy Bridge, I'd recommend keeping it below 1.4-1.45 volts. Normally, a 4 core CPU running at those voltages will reach 70-80 degrees even with a high-performance cooler.

VCCSA: This is the System Agent voltage which in this case means Integrated Memory Controller. Since Sandy Bridge IMC has proven to be very robust, it's not really needed unless you want to reach super high memory frequencies or while using all the 4 memory slots. Usually 1.15v should be OK for anything and many overclockers recommend not going above 1.2 volts.

VDIMM/DRAM Voltage: Related to RAM memory, you'll need to increase VDIMM voltage to achieve higher RAM frequencies. Contrary to CPU vCore, different RAM kits need different voltages and they might get to a point where adding voltage won't help anymore depending on the integrated circuits (ICs) built on your memory kit.

As you can see, overclocking has been severely reduced to something easier to practice. In fact, every time we see a new platform coming it normally means we need to learn what the key-values and limits are again. With Sandy Bridge, however, overclocking has become much easier than before, to the point where Intel launched a video where even your grandmother overclocks the PC. If you don't want to mess up with memory timings and frequencies then vCore and CPU multiplier are the values you'll need to check and modify to achieve a decent overclock.

UEFI: BIOS gets a new look

After years and years of using a very old fashioned design within our BIOS now we're able to see something different. Sandy Bridge based motherboards introduced a whole new look which allows you to see colors and images within the BIOS settings. UEFI allows manufacturers to add graphs or charts along with images and scroll bars that can be moved within your mouse or keyboard. While I still prefer my old and trusty keyboard, I'm pretty sure this is a big step for the future of the motherboards. I should add that not all the motherboard manufacturers jumped to the EFI wagon, but I can see them jumping near in the future.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_UEFI-1.jpg

On the image above we can see CPU multiplier, PLL Overvoltage and LLC, which as I explained in the last section, are key-values to obtain high clocks. In the image below we can also see CPU Voltage, VCCSA, VCCIO and DRAM voltage.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_UEFI-2.jpg

Some manufacturers like ASUS will give you the opportunity to modify CPU current and power limits in order to achieve higher stability and clocks when adding voltage to your CPU. Try using them when your motherboard seems to be restarting by a factor that might not be stability, but more like a whole restart given by the motherboard limits. Now that we've seen the new EFI interface, let's move on to the P67 test platform.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_UEFI-3.jpg

Intel P67 Test Platform

  • Processor: 3.3GHz Intel Core i5 2500K Unlocked CPU
  • Processor: 3.4GHz Intel Core i7 2600K Unlocked CPU
  • CPU Heatsink: Noctua NH-D14 with NF-P14 fans
  • Motherboard: ASUS P8P67 WS Revolution P67 Motherboard
  • System Memory: 2x4GB G.Skill Ripjaw X Series DDR3 (1333MHz @ 9-9-9-20)
  • Video: ASUS ENGTX 560 Ti
  • Disk Drive 1: Intel X-25M 80GB SSD
  • Disk Drive 2: Seagate Barracuda 1TB SATA
  • PSU: Antec Signature 850W
  • Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate x64

Applications & Utilities

  • CPUID CPU-ZROG Edition
  • ASUS Turbo V EVO
  • Real Temp3.67
  • Prime95 - Blend/FTT Test
  • Unigine Heaven 2.1 Benchmark

Overclocking Frequency vs. Voltage

For all you readers who decided to jump the first pages and go straight to the results, I must repeat that there's no interest on testing performance's difference between non overclocked and overclocked setups. That point has been addressed in all our CPU/Motherboard/RAM reviews we've done in the past, and it's up to you to decide whether you need to overclock or not, and how much is "enough" for you. Getting to the point, in this first section I'll be showing how CPU frequency increases against CPU vCore. All those charts are the result of several hours trying and testing different settings and the results reported were 100% stable (considering the stability's paradigm explained before).

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_CPU_Frequency_vs_Voltage.png

As you can see, both Sandy Bridge processors have a vCore around 1.1 volts. This is the reason Sandy Bridge achieves pretty good temps at load conditions at factory settings. The first step was bumping CPU frequency to 4GHz. For this, I just increased CPU multiplier to 40x and added a few milli-volts to the vCore. Both processors were able to achieve 4GHz with 1.15v, which is a very outstanding result. Let's keep in mind that Lynnfield and Nehalem processors needed more voltage (around 1.3v or more) to achieve 4GHz. The only processors able to reach 4GHz almost at stock voltage were the Core i3 and Core i5 Clarkdale CPUs, but all of them worked with 2 cores/4 threads.

With Sandy Bridge we're not going to break any record at 4GHz, so my next step was passing to 4.4GHz. I'd say this is the best frequency according to CPU temperature and power consumption. It required something around 1.25v to keep both processors rock stable. Up to this point, it seems both the Core i5 and the Core i7 require similar voltages to achieve the same frequencies. However, let's not forget that the i7 has 2MB of extra L3 cache and works with Hyper Threading technology.

Finally, I set my highest stable point at 4.8GH. I needed almost 1.4v for the Core i7 and 1.4v for the Core i5 in order to achieve a stable platform here. With those voltages, the CPUs reached the limit and the temperatures raised a lot against stock settings. Just for fun, I tried getting 5GHz stable without any success. I would need a better motherboard and probably a better heatsink with more than 1.45v in order to achieve my dream, but I didn't want to risk any of my CPUs just for a test.

Overclock vs. Power Consumption

Some people cry a lot about power consumption (including me). I'm the kind of person who wants the best efficiency if possible, and that means I want my CPU as fast as I can without doubling power consumption. As if we didn't have enough with all the extra components already! Reality is, many people don't even bother about power consumption, and after all, that's why they paid for an 800 watt PSU (even if they normally don't use more than 300 watts). Anyway, I'll test both Idle and Prime 95 modes and measure CPU power consumption with Real Temp 3.67. Have a look at the next results as they represent power consumption in idle mode. These numbers are important as you probably keep your PC near idle mode 70% (or more) of your time.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_CPU_Power_vs_Voltage_Idle.png

Woah! Those processors barely use 6 watts at idle mode. This is with EIST and Turbo Boost enabled. When overclocked, it seems the CPU power consumption raised somewhere between 10 and 11 watts, but still, seems like a very nice result. Anyway, we can only make conclusions after analyzing Full Load results, but I hope they won't increase that much. Let's have a look at the next chart:

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_CPU_Power_vs_Voltage_Prime95.png

OK now we're talking. The Core i7 2600K consumes 10 extra watts against the Core i5 2500K at full load. When overclocked to 4GHz, the i5 increased 16 watts while the i7 increased 17 watts. The next step was overclocking both CPUs at 4.4GHz which according to the voltage it needs; it seems like the sweet point for Sandy Bridge overclocking. The Core i5 increased its power consumption to 82 watts, which is 23 extra watts against stock values, while the i7 increased to 94 watts, nearly arriving to the TDP.

Finally at 4.8GHz the Core i5 consumes 90 watts, which is 50% extra consumption, while the Core i7 2600K reaches 105 watts, representing a 50% extra power consumption also. Of course, increasing power consumption means the CPU heatsink will have more watts to dissipate, thus increasing CPU temperatures. Let's have a look at our voltage vs. temperature results in the next page then.

Overclock vs. Temperatures

Heat is one of the main concerns when overclocking. Some people think they could fry their CPU because of the heat, and that scares them. However, this is far from reality. CPUs and motherboards are so protected that it is almost impossible to burn a CPU by heating it that much. It would be easier to fry your CPU by short circuiting or adding extreme voltage values, but heat isn't normally a problem as components tend to shut down when passing off their limits. However, even if heat isn't that dangerous, it's removal is key for higher and stable overclocks, and that's why Benchmark Reviews covers a lot of CPU heatsinks in our articles. In my tests, I used Noctua's NH-D14 heatsink paired with 2 x NF-P14 140mm fans. Most people won't have this kind of cooling, but the Prolimatech Megahalems or Thermalright Venomous-X should be able to get similar results. Anyway, if you're really aiming at maximum frequencies, you'll need to buy a decent heatsink. If you're stuck with Intel's stock cooler or something similar, chances are that you won't be able to stabilize anything above 1.2-1.3 volts. In this case, I included full load (Prime95 FTT Test) results and idle numbers too.

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_CPU_Temperature_vs_Voltage_Idle.png

At idle mode my Core i7 seems to be colder than the Core i5 processor. Only when increasing voltage and CPU frequency, the Core i7 rises up its temperature to the point where it matches the Core i5 temperature. This is however a non-important case as they're both at idle mode. The real deal will appear in the next chart after I make them pass 30 minutes of Prime95 FTT test:

SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_CPU_Temperature_vs_Voltage_Prime95.png

At stock frequencies both CPUs are quite cold. They don't even reach 50 degrees, which is great for any PC. At this point the Core i7 is colder than the Core i5, which seems natural after watching the CPU power consumption charts. At 4GHz the temperature raised to 51 degrees for both processors. At 4.4GHz the Core i7 2600K raised its temperature to 59 degrees while the Core i5 2500K reached 57 degrees probably because it's got less thread and cache. Finally, at 4.8GHz the Core i5 reached 67 degrees and the i7 reached 74 degrees. Remember that limit between 70-80 degrees? That means we shouldn't put any extra voltage to the Core i7, while the Core i5 still has got a little gap to test. Anyway, it's always better to keep your CPU below 70 degrees.

Intel Sandy Bridge Final Thoughts

I hope I've covered the basics of overclocking the Sandy Bridge platforms in this article, and even more, I hope to persuade you to try it with your PC, as you don't really have anything to lose, while you have a lot to gain. When someone starts overclocking, it becomes a passion at that moment, and you don't want to use your PC at stock settings again. This way, you not only understand your PC in a better way, but it works in practice, in order to help you identify bugs and errors in different setups. You'll get accustomed to identifying variables and fix both hardware and software errors and the best part is that you'll feel satisfied with yourself as you start knowing better, each part of your PC.SandyBridge_OC_Analysis_4.8.png

More than analyzing the enhanced performance of an overclocked system versus a stock one, I hope to have prepared the terrain for those who want to start overclocking, but are scared to try it with their PCs. The reason I did all the tests with each processor was I wanted to show you an example of what you can achieve by overclocking, and how this will impact your heat production and power consumption. Also, you might be able to achieve similar clocks with similar setups. Just remember every CPU/Motherboard is different, and that means you could get better results, as well as you could have disappointing results. But overall, I think this little analysis will help you to get to know with the most "common" values and limits of Sandy Bridge CPUs.

We are close to 0 extra versions to test as we don't have any other unlocked CPU at the moment. At the time I'm writing this article, there are some signs of the Z68 chipset, which will be some kind of a hybrid between P67 and H67, but until then, we're stuck with a P67 platform and the Core i5 2500K and the i7 2600K processors.

Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking Guide Conclusion

I want to end this article by letting you know that I'm very impressed with the overclocking abilities of the new Sandy Bridge processors. Intel made the whole overclocking process easier, and the clocks we reach with the new processors are just insane! The bad thing is that we're now fully limited to certain chipset and processors to do so, while the rest of the CPUs are fully locked to their Turbo frequencies. In the past, getting a Core i3 and overclocking it like hell was very fun, as it represented a very competitive product in the low-mid market. With Sandy Bridge there won't be any more overclocked entry-level setups, or overclocked HTPCs.

Also, there's always the point of learning and having great skills to understand how different settings and variables work, but with Sandy Bridge all things are easier, and that means more people will be able to compete or achieve high clocks without reading and visiting multiple different sites and forums as they did before. It's just a win-lose paradigm, depending on which side of the road we are positioned. I must also add that sub-zero overclocking was pretty fun to do. Intel somehow killed this as it seems Sandy Bridge CPUs won't clock that high at subzero temperatures, and the difference is minimum.

We are all expecting to see new unlocked CPUs (perhaps a Core i3 unlocked edition) and the Z68 platform along with Ivy Bridge and the new 2011 socket to see where's the future going, but meanwhile, we can get some fun with air/water coolers and the actual Sandy Bridge CPUs now that the S-ATA bug is no longer on B3 revision motherboards.

Benchmark Reviews invites you to leave constructive feedback below, or ask questions in our Discussion Forum.


Related Articles:
 

Comments 

 
# RE: Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking GuideJackNaylorPE 2011-04-21 12:37
Would have liked to see a comparison of setting the Turbo / Voltage to a fixed number versus using the Max turbo frequency / voltage offset method.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking GuideServando Silva 2011-04-21 13:53
Hi Jack. Please check our forum as I've just explained why I didn't test that way. It would need another article just for that, or at least, a new set of tests.
Take care.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking GuideRobert17 2011-04-21 13:24
Nicely done. But you did make it seem like the "good old days" of mounting a PVC tank with a fish-tank pump feeding from an ice chest full of frigid water may be a thing of the past.

Not to get too far away from your core article regarding Sandy Bridge, but do you have any insight as to whether or not AMD will maintain OC potential in their new lineup?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking GuideServando Silva 2011-04-21 13:57
Yeah. I've been overclocking for the last 10 years and I know many others who have been doing it for 15 years or so.
You know that phrase: "Like the old days". I'm not saying I don't like this new way of overclocking. Actually, I like not to pass several hours to find such a nasty or complex configuration for my PC, and doing it the the old way. New OC tools and features help a lot when what you just need is to bump your PC speed and get back to work, but sometimes it was funny to test and read a lot for that.
Also, sub-zero overclocking is quite fun, but with Sandy Bridge they somehow killed it.

Regarding the new AMD processors, I still have no information about them, so I'm anxious to test one.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking GuideDavid Ramsey 2011-04-21 14:30
The new way of overclocking-- raising the maximum multiplier use by Turbo Boost-- has one huge advantage over the old ways of increasing BCLK or the base multiplier: to wit, the processor can still downclock to low speeds when you don't need the performance. My 4.1gHz 980x always runs at 4.1gHz. A 4+gHz Sandy Bridge can idle at the same speed it does non-overclocked, saving a lot of power (and generating less heat).
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking GuideRobert17 2011-04-21 15:51
I'm not complaining. Maybe just pining a bit. I set up a simple OC on my MB, seldom vary it due to the stability, change to game, pretty much ignoring the power consumption. My bad. What limited understanding I have of UEFI seems to indicate that rebooting to change configs may become simpler.

And certainly the advantages of having a MB/CPU combo that is "self-monitoring" power, thrust, pitch and yaw outweigh the "good old days". And yes, I mostly like automatic transmissions over three-on-the-tree these days as well.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking GuideServando Silva 2011-04-22 11:45
Completely true! As I've said. I'm not really complaining. I like the new way as it benefits final users. It's just they took away that "chilli spice" when overclocking. Also, they limited it to Unlocked processors and certain platforms.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking GuideOlle P 2011-04-22 10:30
"... sub-zero overclocking is quite fun, but with Sandy Bridge they somehow killed it."

You can say that again! I read somewhere that Sandy Bridge reach its peak performance at about 20C. If you cool it more than that it won't reach quite as high speeds.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking GuideServando Silva 2011-04-22 11:48
Do you want me to say it louder? Yeah!
I've heard some processors do worst when going below 10-20C degrees. Again, it's good because now many users will be able to play and overclock without going extreme, but it won't be as interesting for extreme users.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Intel Sandy Bridge Overclocking GuideJackNaylorPE 2011-04-24 15:35
One other thing I'd love to see addressed ... POITA ain't I :) ..... the 2600k I assume is running hotter cause of the HT..... Prior to reading the article, I cam to the same conclusion that 4.4 Ghz was the sweet spot for the 2600k for 24/7/365. Since this was a B'day build for Son No. 3, w/ Spring break and all I haven't been able to get near the thing in a week.....I used the Asus BIOS Profile feature to store OC Profiles from 4.0 to 4.8 GHz w/ these temps on the SIlver Arrow cooler:

Max Core Temps under (Idle - P95 load)

GHz..... 3.8 ... 4.00 ...... 4.2 ........ 4.4 ........ 4.6 ....... 4.80
Core 1 (51) (31 - 52) (29 - 54) (29 - 56) (31 - 62) (29 - 69)
Core 2 (53) (30 - 54) (30 - 56) (30 - 60) (31 - 66) (28 - 75)
Core 3 (53) (23 - 55) (22 - 57) (22 - 60) (31 - 68) (28 - 79)
Core 4 (51) (29 - 52) (28 - 55) (29 - 57) )31 - 65) (28 - 72)

Hope that formats well

What I am thinking now is making a "gaming profile" w/ HT turned off since I can prolly drop 7 - 10C at 4.8 Ghz ..... will give it a # when kid gets back in school but wondering if anyone's tried yet on SB.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews Archive