| SilverStone SST-AP181 Air Penetrator Fan |
| Reviews - Featured Reviews: Cooling | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Written by David Ramsey | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Monday, 09 August 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SilverStone SST-AP181 Air Penetrator Fan ReviewSilverStone is a company that needs no introduction to most enthusiasts. Although they're best known for their extensive line of computer cases, the company also produces power supplies, fans, and other computer-related hardware. As high end computer components increasingly use more power and thus generate more heat, dealing with the increasing "thermal load" of an enthusiast-level systems becomes more and more difficult, especially if you don't want to resort to water cooling or even more exotic methods. Although simplified all-in-one water cooling systems like the CoolIT ECO A.L.C. have performance equal to some high-end air coolers, the vast majority of systems continue to be air cooled. A systems builder or enthusiast must weigh a variety of factors when choosing fans for their air-cooled system. The main criteria when selecting fans are airflow, typically expressed in cubic feet per minute (CFM) and noise, measured in decibels (dB or db(A)). Some manufacturers will also specify the "static pressure" their fans can maintain when blowing air into an enclosed or obstructed area; this is useful information when a fan is blowing into an obstruction like a radiator, but less important when it's not.
One big different between fan specifications and other part specifications is that most users have no way to verify them, since measuring the air flow, noise, and static pressure of a fan is difficult or impossible without specialized equipment. What we can do is test the cooling performance, and in this test, Benchmark Reviews will compare the cooling performance of the SilverStone SST-AP181 "air penetrator" fan with the performance of SilverStone's stock 180mm fan in the Fortress FT02 computer case.
Manufacturer: SilverStone Technology Full Disclosure:The product samples used in this article has been provided by SilverStone Technology. Air Penetrator Features
SST-AP181 Specifications
Features and specifications provided by SilverStone Technology Closer Look: SilverStone SST-AP181 FanThe SilverStone SST-AP181 fan is delivered in a rather plain brown box. The fan's features are enumerated on the front.
A 180mm fan is much larger than the 120mm fans normally used in computer cases. The fan on the left in this photo is the Yate Loon D12SH-12 fan, a popular choice among enthusiasts given its rated 88CFM airflow and $6.99 price; it's dwarfed by the SilverStone SST-AP181 fan on the right. Size aside, both fans have 7 blades of similar design. One interesting thing about the AP181 is its integrated fan grille.
Each AP181 has a standard 3-pin power lead and a separate "low/high" speed switch. The switch is designed for the SilverStone Raven and Fortress FT02 cases, which have specific mounting areas for it; if you don't have one of these cases, you'll need to come up with some place to put the switch (you could, of course, simply leave it inside the case as well). At low speed, the fan runs at 700RPM; at high speed, it runs at 1200RPM. Standard computer case fan sizes are 80mm, 92mm, 120mm, and 140mm; a few cases will accept larger 200 and 220mm fans, but the smaller sizes dominate. In general, larger fans more more air with less noise than smaller fans; but the wider blade area means the airflow is spread over a larger area. As far as I know, SilverStone is the only vendor that (a) makes 180mm case fans and (b) has cases designed to accept this unusual size. Unless you own a SilverStone Raven RV01/RV02, or Fortress FT02 case, or are building your own highly customized computer case, you're probably not in the market for one of these fans. Air Penetrator Detailed FeaturesI'm comparing the AP181 fan to the 180mm fans used as the stock fans in an SilverStone Fortress FT02 case. These seem to be modified versions of the FM181 fan SilverStone sells separately. Since SilverStone doesn't sell a stand-alone version of the FT02 fan, I'll simply call it "the FT02 fan". The chart below compares the specifications of the three fans.
Compared to the FT02 fan, the AP181 seems very similar. The only visual difference is the integrated grille of the AP181. The FM181 sold separately has no grille, but the FT02 fan has a honeycomb grille (removed for this photo) that SilverStone makes available as an option for those buying the FM181 fan.
Given the amperage these fans draw, it's probably a good idea to run them directly from your power supply rather than from a motherboard header. But looking at the comparative specs of the FT02 fan and the AP181, there doesn't seem to be much difference: the latter draws significantly more power at maximum, but is specified to deliver the same 130CFM airflow. Your first clue might be the higher static pressures (especially at the high speed), but if you missed that, SilverStone provides a hint on the back of the box.
SilverStone claims the "Air Penetrator" design provides (for lack of a better term) a more "focussed" column of air from the fan. They've even prepared an interesting YouTube video showing the difference.
It looks like the Air Penetrator blows a much more coherent column of air than ordinary fans. But will this translate into better performance? Let's see... Air Penetrator Fan InstallationThese fans, with their long power leads and integrated speed switches, are designed to be plug-in replacements for the stock fans used in an SilverStone RV01, RV02, or FT02 computer case. The fan speed switches are located at the top of these SilverStone cases, and each switch is secured by two very small, easy to drop and loose screws. Remove the screws holding in these switches and put them carefully away.
Next, remove the two screws at the front of each fan bracket. This allows the stock fan to slide out of the bottom of the case. Carefully feed the leads for the power and speed switch through the case as you remove the stock fan.
Once the fan is removed from the case, you'll need to unscrew and remove the combination mounting bracket/filter holder, since you'll be using this to mount the AP181 fan.
After you've secured the AP181 fan to the mounting bracket, it slips easily back into the case. Slide the filter in the slot in the bracket, then secure the speed switch at the appropriate place at the top of the case. The yellow wire of the switch should be nearest the "H" setting.
OK, the fans are installed. Let's see how they perform relative to the stock FT02 fans. Fan Testing and ResultsThe system I used for testing is the same one I built into the FT02 case originally, which I described in my SilverStone FT02 Computer Case review. It comprises an ASUS P6T V2 Deluxe motherboard, 12G of Corsair Dominator memory, two NVIDIA GTX480 video cards, and an Intel Core i7 980X processor. I used Everest Ultimate version 5.5 to load the processor with the "Stress CPU" and "Stress FPU" tests. The results are presented as "thermal difference": the difference between the processor temperature and the ambient temperature. For these tests the Intel Core i7 980x processor was overclocked to 4.1GHz with a 160MHz BCLK and 1.35 volts.
The CPU cooler used was a dual-fan Cooler Master V6GT. And here are the results:
SilverStone claims that the AP181 fans set to "low" provide the same performance as the original case fans set to "High". This certainly seems to be true: in fact, the AP181's on low provide slightly better performance than the FT02 fans on high. The difference between the stock fans on low and the AP181 fans on high is 3.7 degrees. Now let's look at the NVIDIA GTX480 temperatures with the video card fans set to "auto". I took idle and load temperature measurements (using Furmark 1.8.2 Multi GPU version to load the cards) with the case fans set to both low and high speeds.
Here we see much less difference between the FT02 fans and the AP181 fans. The AP181 wins by a degree or so at idle with low fan speed, but actually falls behind slightly at idle with high fan speed. When the cards are loaded with Furmark, the temperatures with the AP181 fans are actually higher than the temperatures with the FT02 fans. Let's try the test again with the GTX480 fans set to 100%, as they might be in an overclocking or benchmarking scenario.
Here, the AP181 fans provide a much better performance: the GTX480 load temperatures are 0.9 to 5.9 degrees cooler with the case fans set to "low", and 3.9 to 4.9 degrees lower when the case fans are set to "high". But then I had a crazy thought...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

Comments
You might be able to run the fans with a separate fan controller, leaving the attached switches set to "high", but not knowing how the attached switches are wired up, it's just a guess.
Since you'll be running the system at its stock clocks, why bother with a fan on the Megahalems at all? As my tests showed, a Megahalems will keep a 980X nice and cool with no attached fan, just using the airflow from the AP181s.
I would like to know when you install the Prolimtech SM Cooler in FT02 your review, could the FT02 case side panel be closed? Isn't the spec for this cooler very tall and could touch the side panel case?
/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=553&Itemid=62&limit=1&limitstart=
I am thinking of getting similar sized cooler for my RV02 like CM Hyper 212+ GP which is cheaper.
Your assistance is very much appreciated.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Harry
thank you for the review. I was wondering, is it possible to thest the Thermalright HR-02 in the passive setup with the FT-02 case (AP-181 fan)?
That would be lovely :)
Take care
They were noisy so I put a drop of sowing machine oil in the bearings.
I was going to ditch them for new fans and was considering the air penetrator. It is expensive in Aussie. Would this type of fan be a good radiator fan?