| Video Card Graphics Rebound in Q3'09 |
| Written by Jon Peddie Research | ||
| Monday, 16 November 2009 | ||
The Anticipated Rebound for the Graphics Add-in Board Market Materializes in Q3'09 Reports Jon Peddie ResearchThe bounce lagged the broader graphics market, but very welcome nonethelessBetter late than never. While a market rebound for graphics add-in boards (AIBs) didn't occur in sync with the broader graphics hardware markets, it did eventually materialize in the third quarter, reports Jon Peddie Research. The market (along with most others) had suffered a major drop in Q4'08. Volume flattened in the first quarter as drained-down inventories regained some lost weight, and Q2'09 mercifully showed demand stabilizing and more evidence the market had bottomed. What was in store for the third quarter? The firm had been expecting a bounce in the second half, with the first signs to be manifested in Q3'09. And to the relief of many, that's how the story unfolded. The quarter saw 20.3 million graphics cards shipped, up 21.0% sequentially, a particularly robust number considering the two major vendors were on the tail end of product cycles. Even in the context of a year-over-year measure, the quarter's 7.2% decline was significantly more moderate than the firm had seen in the previous quarters. Graphics AIB unit history
The AIB market gets its bounce, albeit delayed The reason? The firm attributed the dynamic to more hesitant buyers with tighter wallets in Q2. As frugal buyers cautiously made their way back to the marketplace, they tended to opt more for lower-performance - but essentially free - IGPs over add-in boards. But thanks to improved consumer confidence, more AIBs left retail shelves (and PC assembly lines) in the third-quarter.
Not surprisingly, the battle lines for Nvidia vs. AMD relatively quiet in the third quarter Nvidia, however, will have to get by this holiday season with previous-generation products, as it hustles to get products based on its ambitious Fermi generation ready for (what appears to be) the first quarter of 2010. The one potential snag for AMD is the broadly reported, less-than-stellar ramp of 40 nm product coming out of TSMC. Nvidia's relying on 40 nm as well, but should TSMC's struggle with yield be limited to the fourth quarter, and not Q1'10, then it will be AMD that will primarily suffer, not Nvidia.
|
||